Crossing Over
DOI: 10.2307/j.ctv6cfr8k.9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Canadian Attitudes to Genetically Modified Food

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding is in accordance with our hypothesis. This finding is consistent with past findings that WTP for GMF increases with GMF benefit perception (Anand et al, 2007;Han & Harrison, 2006;Lusk, 2004;Onyango et al, 2004;Veeman et al, 2005). A possible explanation for the finding that risk perception has insignificant influence and benefit perception has significant influence might be similar to that reported in past studies (Han & Harrison, 2006;Moon & Balasubramanian, 2003)-that the benefit perceptions of GMF outweigh the risk perceptions.…”
Section: Figuresupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This finding is in accordance with our hypothesis. This finding is consistent with past findings that WTP for GMF increases with GMF benefit perception (Anand et al, 2007;Han & Harrison, 2006;Lusk, 2004;Onyango et al, 2004;Veeman et al, 2005). A possible explanation for the finding that risk perception has insignificant influence and benefit perception has significant influence might be similar to that reported in past studies (Han & Harrison, 2006;Moon & Balasubramanian, 2003)-that the benefit perceptions of GMF outweigh the risk perceptions.…”
Section: Figuresupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The health and environmental attributes may be associated with the GM attribute. A general observation on these data is that there appears to be a tendency for more individuals with negative (rather than positive or neutral) attitudes to the GM attribute to access the information provided (Veeman et al 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The third section was devoted to attitudinal factors (see result section) 44,[59][60][61][62][63] that may influence WTR GM foods. In this block, the survey focused on perceptions of risks (four questions), benefits of GM foods (five questions) and trust in GM sources of information (five questions).…”
Section: Survey Designmentioning
confidence: 99%