2011
Can Questioning Induce Forgetting? Retrieval‐Induced Forgetting of Eyewitness Information
Abstract: Summary: In eyewitness situations, questioning can be seen as a form of retrieval practice that may have detrimental effects on eyewitness memory. Memory research has demonstrated that retrieval practice may not only enhance memory for practiced information but also induce forgetting of related information. The present study examined the effect of retrieval practice on forgetting in eyewitness memory. First, we investigated whether asking questions about particular offender characteristics can induce forgettin…
Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Select...
15
3
2
0
Citation Types
0
13
0
0
Year Published
2012
2026
Publication Types
Select...
14
2
2
1
Relationship
0
19
Authors
Journals
Cited by 19 publications
(13 citation statements)
References 22 publications
0
13
0
0
“…However, the participants in the denying group probably did not need to retrieve their memories but simply to give a denial response, regardless of whether the asked-about item was on their shopping list. It has been suggested that the retrieval-induced forgetting effect occurs when people are asked questions concerning eyewitness information because they need to retrieve their memories to answer the questions ( Camp et al, 2012 ). The same situation may have occurred in the truth-telling and mixed lying groups in the present study, causing these groups to perform worse in the item memory test than those who may not have needed to retrieve their memories, such as the denying group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the participants in the denying group probably did not need to retrieve their memories but simply to give a denial response, regardless of whether the asked-about item was on their shopping list. It has been suggested that the retrieval-induced forgetting effect occurs when people are asked questions concerning eyewitness information because they need to retrieve their memories to answer the questions ( Camp et al, 2012 ). The same situation may have occurred in the truth-telling and mixed lying groups in the present study, causing these groups to perform worse in the item memory test than those who may not have needed to retrieve their memories, such as the denying group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Output interference indicates that sometimes other explanations, rather than the inhibition-based mechanism, can account for the forgetting due to the retrieval practice (e.g., competition-based mechanism; Verde, 2012; Raaijmakers and Jakab, 2013). Still, even controlling for output interference, recent research has indicated that RIF effects still take place, for instance, in witness circumstances (e.g., Camp et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When an eyewitness is questioned during an interview about an event, this process involves retrieving relevant information from their memory (Camp et al 2012). During the interview, the interviewer always dominates the interview whilst the eyewitnesses are placed in the passive role to respond to the questions (Fisher and Geiselman 2010;Fisher and Schreiber 2007;Milne et al 2007).…”
Section: Eyewitness Status Question Type and The Amount And Accuracy ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
