2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2022.105895
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can public debt mitigate environmental debt? Theory and empirical evidence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Opinions are divided regarding the effect of government debt on carbon dioxide emissions. When the government incurs debt for research and development of low carbon technology, Boly et al (2019) argues that it can translate into a quality environment. However, government debt may put stress on the environment due to the need to increase output for debt settlement.…”
Section: Review On Debt-carbon Emission Nexus and Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Opinions are divided regarding the effect of government debt on carbon dioxide emissions. When the government incurs debt for research and development of low carbon technology, Boly et al (2019) argues that it can translate into a quality environment. However, government debt may put stress on the environment due to the need to increase output for debt settlement.…”
Section: Review On Debt-carbon Emission Nexus and Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results paint the picture that a lower level of debt enables the government to deal with environmental issues. It could be that the government is able to channel resources from loans to support advanced technology to help address environmental challenges (Boly et al, 2019). However as the debt increases and there is the need to settle the debt, attention shifts from allocating resources into environmentally friendly ventures to non-environmentally friendly ventures.…”
Section: Meq 343mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Brock and Taylor (2010) model the same trade-off by removing abatement costs from the income available for consumption and investment elsewhere. More recently, Boly et al (2022) describe an endogenous growth model where public debt is used to fund pollution abatement. Underlying this model is the premise that pollution abatement is a drag on economic activity and a drain on resources.…”
Section: Reconsidering the Gdp And Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%