Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
4
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We start by noting that indirect support of the possible dichotomy versus continuum explanation could be found in two recent studies, both involving Mandarin speakers, which we were not aware of when we planned our own work (i.e., Ding et al, 2020;Xiao et al, 2018). Xiao et al (2018) observed an inversion of the spatial representation of time-similar to that reported here-across two experiments.…”
Section: Dichotomies Versus Continua: Can Stimuli Distribution Shape ...supporting
confidence: 56%
“…We start by noting that indirect support of the possible dichotomy versus continuum explanation could be found in two recent studies, both involving Mandarin speakers, which we were not aware of when we planned our own work (i.e., Ding et al, 2020;Xiao et al, 2018). Xiao et al (2018) observed an inversion of the spatial representation of time-similar to that reported here-across two experiments.…”
Section: Dichotomies Versus Continua: Can Stimuli Distribution Shape ...supporting
confidence: 56%
“…Thus, an important issue is whether the representation of EAMs along a sagittal MTL is a universal phenomenon, consistent across different cultures. It has been suggested that the sagittal MTL originates from at least two types of sources, namely the sensorimotor experience associated with walking, and the metaphoric mapping between time and space in language (Ding et al, 2020 ). Although results of the present study are consistent with previous evidence of a sagittal MTL in western populations (Miles, Karpinska, et al, 2010b ; Miles, Nind, & Macrae, 2010a ; Rinaldi et al, 2016 ), future studies should address whether the organization of EAM along a sagittal MTL shows cultural variations related to differences in metaphoric mapping habits between space and time.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It seems, then, that while on the SAGITTAL axis nonlinguistic EARLIER and FUTURE map to the same pole, and so do LATER and PAST, on the VERTICAL and LATERAL axes the shared polarities are EARLIER-PAST and LATER-FUTURE, suggesting that there is "something different" about temporal conceptualizations on the sagittal axis, as compared with the lateral and vertical axes, at least as assessed in these nonverbal response tasks. However, another recent congruency-effect study by Ding et al (2020) of PAST/FUTURE mappings found the "exceptional" axis to be the lateral one. Using a similar paradigm to that of Xiao et al's experiment 2, but with free choice of axis by participants, these investigators found that "the lateral time line could co-exist with the other two, while saggital and vertical mental time lines could not co-exist with each other" (Ding et al 2020: 103084), suggesting a different space-time mapping mechanism for the lateral axis on the one hand, and the sagittal and vertical axes on the other.…”
Section: Previous Relevant Experimental Studiesmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Boroditsky (2001Boroditsky ( , 2008 has proposed that Mandarin Chinese speakers preferentially conceptualize time on the vertical axis as a result of its prevalence in linguistic metaphorical usage. Ding et al (2020)'s congruence study, as well as suggesting a possible different mechanism for lateral axis mapping than for the other two axes, found an advantage for the vertical axis over the sagittal axis. However, in the dataset of non-directionally cued co-speech gestures elicited by Li (2017) reliably more gestures were produced on the lateral than on the vertical axis, and vertical axis gestures were in turn significantly more frequent than sagittal gestures.…”
Section: Research Focus and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 98%