2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.hal.2008.08.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can cryptophyte abundance trigger toxic Karlodinium veneficum blooms in eutrophic estuaries?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

7
87
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
(99 reference statements)
7
87
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although cryptophytes are considered a "high-quality" food, lacking hard exoskeleton structures or toxic metabolic products (Brett andMüller-Navarra 1997, Sterner andSchulz 1998), their higher content in bivalve food causes the red colouration of the tissue, making the mariculture products unfavourable for commercial needs (Pastoureaud et al 2003). Furthermore, cryptophytes are essential for the development of toxic or harmful blooms of some dinoflagellates (Adolf et al 2008) and ciliates (Peterson et al 2013). Such diverse interactions of cryptophytes with their environment and their importance for the marine food web emphasize the necessity for future monitoring of phytoplankton communities and environmental parameters in the area in order to detect the changes that might have a profound effect on the estuary's ecosystem dynamics and mariculture production.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although cryptophytes are considered a "high-quality" food, lacking hard exoskeleton structures or toxic metabolic products (Brett andMüller-Navarra 1997, Sterner andSchulz 1998), their higher content in bivalve food causes the red colouration of the tissue, making the mariculture products unfavourable for commercial needs (Pastoureaud et al 2003). Furthermore, cryptophytes are essential for the development of toxic or harmful blooms of some dinoflagellates (Adolf et al 2008) and ciliates (Peterson et al 2013). Such diverse interactions of cryptophytes with their environment and their importance for the marine food web emphasize the necessity for future monitoring of phytoplankton communities and environmental parameters in the area in order to detect the changes that might have a profound effect on the estuary's ecosystem dynamics and mariculture production.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The species has been reported to produce a different substance with neurotoxic activity (Garcés et al, 2006), but the specific toxin has not been isolated and chemically characterised. While K. veneficum seems to prefer cryptophytes as food (Li et al, 1999;Adolf et al, 2008), K. armiger ingests most types of unicellular prey offered. It displays pronounced swarming behaviour and forms feeding aggregates when fed algal prey, allowing ingestion of prey several times larger than itself (Berge et al, 2008a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several aspects of its biology (Adolf et al, 2008), toxins (Deeds et al, 2002;Van Wagoner et al, 2010) and harmful effects on fish (Nielsen, 1993) have been described in detail and were recently reviewed (Place et al, 2011). The haemolytic and neurotoxic Karlotoxins (Deeds et al, 2002;Van Wagoner et al, 2010) produced by K. veneficum aid prey capture and are used directly to stun cryptophytes before ingestion (Sheng et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Roles of karlotoxins have been conjectured to mediate grazing pressures and as an allelochemical (13,14). However, on the basis of field data showing that cryptophyte's abundance precedes K. veneficum blooms (15) and laboratory feeding experiments demonstrating that only toxic strains are mixotrophic (16,17), hypothesized that karlotoxins provide advantages in prey capture. Here, we investigate whether and how karlotoxins are used during predation by measuring changes in swimming behavior of predators and prey.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four strains of K. veneficum (7,17) with identical genetic signatures (internal transcribed spacer sequence), two from Chesapeake Bay (MD5 and CCMP 1974) and two from estuaries south of Chesapeake Bay (BM1 and CCMP 2064), were examined. MD5 produces no detectable toxin and shows no mixotrophic behavior (15). Of the rest, 1974 produces KmTx-1 (0.3 pg/cell), whereas BM1 and 2064 produce KmTx-2 in a cell quota ranging from 1 to 2 pg/cell (5).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%