2009
DOI: 10.4067/s0718-19572009000200005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cambios interanuales en la biomasa y biodiversidad de zooplancton gelatinoso en aguas interiores de Chiloé, sur de Chile (primaveras 2004 y 2005)

Abstract: Abstract.-Zooplankton biomass was compared between the fraction of chitinous and gelatinous organisms from the southern region of Chile between Puerto Montt and Boca del Guafo, in the springs of 2004 and 2005. The biomass values were higher in 2004, being mainly composed by chitinous fraction, particularly in the north microbasin. Conversely, during 2005, a sharp increase of the gelatinous fraction was observed reaching 60% of the total biomass in the northern microbasin, and gradually decreasing into the Boca… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
29
0
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
3
29
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…2-16). After photographs were taken, the specimens were identified using identification keys and descriptions available (e.g., ToTTon 1965, kirkPaTrick & PugH 1984, Pagès & gili 1992, PugH 1999. Morphological descriptions of the anterior nectophores of the identified species were made, as well as drawings of the best-preserved specimens using the Adobe Illustrator software .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…2-16). After photographs were taken, the specimens were identified using identification keys and descriptions available (e.g., ToTTon 1965, kirkPaTrick & PugH 1984, Pagès & gili 1992, PugH 1999. Morphological descriptions of the anterior nectophores of the identified species were made, as well as drawings of the best-preserved specimens using the Adobe Illustrator software .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This species is recognized by its small size, and by the apical end, which is twisted in preserved specimens (ToTTon 1965).…”
Section: Taxonomymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations