2018
DOI: 10.7289/v5/tm-swfsc-597
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calibration and validation of linked water temperature models for the Shasta Reservoir and the Sacramento River from 2000 to 2015.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We estimated the ability (on a daily mean scale) of discharge-mediated temperature management in the Sacramento River throughout the entire year using a region-specific model called RAFT (Daniels et al, 2018;Pike et al, 2013). RAFT simulates temperature dynamics in a one-dimensional direction longitudinally downstream, while averaging across the depth and lateral sections of a river channel.…”
Section: Water Temperature Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We estimated the ability (on a daily mean scale) of discharge-mediated temperature management in the Sacramento River throughout the entire year using a region-specific model called RAFT (Daniels et al, 2018;Pike et al, 2013). RAFT simulates temperature dynamics in a one-dimensional direction longitudinally downstream, while averaging across the depth and lateral sections of a river channel.…”
Section: Water Temperature Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here we identify and quantify the relationship between reservoir discharge and downstream water temperatures in a large, managed river using a process-based model of river temperature (RAFT; Pike et al, 2013;Daniels et al, 2018). This was done for the Sacramento River by modeling water temperatures over the historical record (1990-2020) of model forcings and only perturbing reservoir discharge levels on a daily time step.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Levels of engagement range from unidirectional participatory facilitation such as (1) outreach to collect data on impairment, local practices, and needs (Eakin et al, 2017;Ponce-Romero et al, 2017), and (2) education about water quality management plans and tools designed for personal and community contribution to the program (e.g., De Freitas et al, 2013;Sun et al, 2015;Daniels et al, 2018;Yusuf et al, 2018;Quinn & Oster, 2021), to fully bi-directional participation such as (3) modeler-led engagement (e.g., Swick, 2007;Estalaki et al, 2016;Criollo et al, 2019;Alamanos et al, 2021;Balestrini et al, 2021), and (4) stakeholder-led engagement (e.g., Petherick 2014; Hadj-Hammou et al 2017;Vaneeckhaute et al 2021). The methodologies associated with these approaches are described in Section 3.2.…”
Section: Leveraging Gis and Remote Sensing Data And Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, modelers and nodal agencies such as the California Central Valley Region State Water Resources Control board (Quinn & Oster, 2021) and the National Marine Fisheries Service (Daniels et al, 2018) have developed online portals through which model-generated basin-scale water quality information can be viewed in innovative ways as well as downloaded for interested stakeholders to understand the system better. In the case of the River Assessment and Forecasting Tool for water temperature in the Sacramento River (Daniels et al, 2018), historic water temperature hindcasts and periodically updated forecasts in the Sacramento River can be viewed in multiple graphical formats such as on a spatio-temporal grid, as a snapshot in time across space, or as multiple timeseries. It can also be downloaded by water operations managers to better manage reservoir and water operations to aid in multipurpose water use in the system.…”
Section: Outreach and Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation