2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2003.10.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calibration and validation of 6 DOFs instrumented spatial linkage for biomechanical applications. A practical approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Homemade transducers can be used but they could pose problems of calibration, reliability and accuracy [17][18][19][20][21]. More recently, portable kinetic systems based on a low profile commercial load cell connected to a recording device have been introduced [22][23][24][25].…”
Section: Portable Kinetic Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Homemade transducers can be used but they could pose problems of calibration, reliability and accuracy [17][18][19][20][21]. More recently, portable kinetic systems based on a low profile commercial load cell connected to a recording device have been introduced [22][23][24][25].…”
Section: Portable Kinetic Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a pose-measuring approach, the end effector is moved and its pose is measured by an external metrology system, e.g. 3D digitizers (Sholukha et al, 2004). In a pose-matching approach, the end effector is moved to match some particular fixture in a reference structure, e.g.…”
Section: Data Collection and Acquisition Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A settling time is nevertheless required to shift in between different acquisition phases. This technique avoids a tedious data collection process, which usually characterizes a calibration approach based on the use of 3D digitizer or calibrated plates, as done in the work by Sholukha et al (2004) and Van Sint Jan et al (2002).…”
Section: Article In Pressmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The real precision of the measurements depends of the actual experimental settings. Previously published results indicated that the experimental digitizing protocol used for this paper showed a precision of 0.8 § 0.5 mm [11]. Spatial locations of the above-deWned anatomical landmarks (AA, DELTIP, REN, REM, LCON, MCON) were digitised in the same reference system.…”
Section: Measurement Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%