2016
DOI: 10.1186/s12884-016-0830-2
View full text |Buy / Rent full text
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract: Background: The rising caesarean section rate is an important public health concern that in turn increases maternal and perinatal risks of adverse effects, unnecessary medical consumption, and inequities in worldwide access. The aim of this study was to investigate caesarean section indications by maternal age group and examine the association between age and caesarean section in primiparous Japanese women with singleton births. Methods: We analyzed the Japanese data of primiparous women with singleton births … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
15
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(9 reference statements)
4
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a systematic review of 21 studies, AMA was confirmed to be an independent risk factor for CS in both nulliparous women and multiparous women . However, the actual mechanisms of the increase of CS with age were not established, although many causes have been proposed, including deterioration of uterine function with increasing maternal age and decreased number of oxytocin receptors, increased rates of chronic medical diseases and previous uterus scar and maternal complications, not to mention the possibility of reduced clinical threshold for obstetric interventions . In our study, an increasing odds ratio of CS could be observed in older parturients (Table ), which was not attenuated after adjustment for obstetric and other demographic factor (Table ), thus suggesting that AMA per se was an independent risk factor for CS.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 42%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a systematic review of 21 studies, AMA was confirmed to be an independent risk factor for CS in both nulliparous women and multiparous women . However, the actual mechanisms of the increase of CS with age were not established, although many causes have been proposed, including deterioration of uterine function with increasing maternal age and decreased number of oxytocin receptors, increased rates of chronic medical diseases and previous uterus scar and maternal complications, not to mention the possibility of reduced clinical threshold for obstetric interventions . In our study, an increasing odds ratio of CS could be observed in older parturients (Table ), which was not attenuated after adjustment for obstetric and other demographic factor (Table ), thus suggesting that AMA per se was an independent risk factor for CS.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 42%
“…In our study, an increasing odds ratio of CS could be observed in older parturients (Table ), which was not attenuated after adjustment for obstetric and other demographic factor (Table ), thus suggesting that AMA per se was an independent risk factor for CS. Furthermore, similar to most other prior studies, the effect of maternal age on the risk of CS was much greater in nulliparous parturients.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 42%
“…A recent study conducted in Bangladesh and other developing countries stated that women's advanced maternal age are more likely to suffer from obstetric and maternal complications than women in middle maternal age, and this may subsequently contribute to the increasing rate of C section deliveries. [25][26][27][28] There was a negative relationship found between birth order and Csection deliveries. It may be due to the fact that the increase in the birth order implies the women are getting more experienced regarding delivery procedures and the chances of having serious complications get reduced.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Several previous studies document a significant association between advanced maternal age (>35 years) and an increased likelihood of CS birth [19,20]. This association may be interpreted as a result of a changing social environment, but a common explanation is the pre-pregnancy morbidities associated in these cases [21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%