The 21st International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility 2019
DOI: 10.1145/3308561.3353771
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CaBot: Designing and Evaluating an Autonomous Navigation Robot for Blind People

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several of the experiments only provided qualitative assessments of how the grounded kinesthetic feedback affected participants' navigation (31,45,46). One study reported that participants required minimal training with their device to walk at faster speeds than previous studies of white cane users (32), supporting the idea that grounded kinesthetic feedback is intuitive. However, these four devices may be challenging to extend to everyday use because they are designed only for indoor use, cost up to $6000 USD, and weigh 6 to 25 kg, whereas the Augmented Cane costs $400 USD and weighs 1.2 kg (table S1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several of the experiments only provided qualitative assessments of how the grounded kinesthetic feedback affected participants' navigation (31,45,46). One study reported that participants required minimal training with their device to walk at faster speeds than previous studies of white cane users (32), supporting the idea that grounded kinesthetic feedback is intuitive. However, these four devices may be challenging to extend to everyday use because they are designed only for indoor use, cost up to $6000 USD, and weigh 6 to 25 kg, whereas the Augmented Cane costs $400 USD and weighs 1.2 kg (table S1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case when various sensors are used to analyze a similar obstacle, they can confirm the obtained information and improve the estimation precision of each other. Kumar [15] has proposed a robotic navigation system including two controllers. The first one is intended to compute the path from the current position to a target point without considering potential obstacles.…”
Section: Roboticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, there are great advances in miniaturized sensors capable of providing parameters of moving objects, such as position and velocity [15][16][17]. The fusion of the advances in both sensors and artificial intelligence has led to many projects that seek to support VIP in navigation [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27], traveling [28][29][30][31], representation of the real world [32][33][34][35], obstacle detection on wayfinding [29,[36][37][38], assistant robots [39,40], and other applications…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, there are great advances in miniaturized sensors capable of providing parameters of moving objects, such as position and velocity [ 15 , 16 , 17 ]. The fusion of the advances in both sensors and artificial intelligence has led to many projects that seek to support VIP in navigation [ 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 ], traveling [ 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 ], representation of the real world [ 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 ], obstacle detection on wayfinding [ 29 , 36 , 37 , 38 ], assistant robots [ 39 , 40 ], and other applications for general mobility, for monitoring and improving PA, and for sports participation of the VIP [ 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 ]. The application spectrum is extensive and may include even sensor fusion for monitoring the vital signs of guide dogs in training [ 45 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%