2018
DOI: 10.1108/ijlm-11-2017-0288
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Buyer–supplier relationships in IT outsourcing: consultants’ perspective

Abstract: Purpose Supply chain relationships have often been analysed from the macro-perspective of the companies involved, but there is less evidence of how relationships relate to the micro-perspective of persons involved. The purpose of this paper is to investigate, in IT outsourcing (ITO), how the buyer–supplier relationship type strengthens buyer performance from the perspective of consultants. Design/methodology/approach IT consultants were surveyed, and analysis was performed considering the aggregated values o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
(133 reference statements)
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…About 73.13% of the reviewed papers focused on collaborative relationships, 19.40% on cooperative relationships, 7.46% on transactional relationships, 2.99% on competitive and coopetitive relationships and 1.49% on coordination and adversarial relationships. x • [80] x • [81] x • [89] x • [82] x • [83] x • [84] x • [85] x • [78] x • [28] x • [87] x • [88] x • [90] x • [86] x • [91] x • [92] x • [93] x • [94] x • [96] x • [95] x • [97] x • [99] x • [98] x • [100] x • [18] x • [101] x • [19] x • [102] x • [27] x • [76] x • [103] x • [104] x • x • [107] x • [1] x • [74] x • [108] x • [109] x • [110] x • [26] x • [42] x • [112] x • [111] x • [113] x • [114] x • [115] x • [116] x • [45] x •…”
Section: B2b Supply Chain Relationshipmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…About 73.13% of the reviewed papers focused on collaborative relationships, 19.40% on cooperative relationships, 7.46% on transactional relationships, 2.99% on competitive and coopetitive relationships and 1.49% on coordination and adversarial relationships. x • [80] x • [81] x • [89] x • [82] x • [83] x • [84] x • [85] x • [78] x • [28] x • [87] x • [88] x • [90] x • [86] x • [91] x • [92] x • [93] x • [94] x • [96] x • [95] x • [97] x • [99] x • [98] x • [100] x • [18] x • [101] x • [19] x • [102] x • [27] x • [76] x • [103] x • [104] x • x • [107] x • [1] x • [74] x • [108] x • [109] x • [110] x • [26] x • [42] x • [112] x • [111] x • [113] x • [114] x • [115] x • [116] x • [45] x •…”
Section: B2b Supply Chain Relationshipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In IT industries, Cha and Kim [111] investigated the collaborative relationship with suppliers in a Korean IT outsourcing firm. Other researchers examined the buyer-supplier collaborative relationship in IT outsourcing [112] and Indian brand-reseller business collaborative relationship [113].…”
Section: Trust-based Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…a make or buy decision is required. In the second paper, exploiting the perspective of the IT providers rather than those acquiring the service, Martins et al (2018) investigate relational forms for IT outsourcing, determining the extent to which strategic relationships require considerable effort on the part of the providers as opposed to relying on purely transactional processes.…”
Section: Papers From the 22nd International Symposium On Logistics (Isl)mentioning
confidence: 99%