1994
DOI: 10.1001/archderm.130.6.808
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts

Bullous photodermatosis after lomefloxacin

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
30
3
3
0

Citation Types

2
8
0
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
23
12

Relationship

0
35

Authors

Journals

citations

Cited by 35 publications

(10 citation statements)
references

References 0 publications

2
8
0
0
Order By: Relevance
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Indeed, various authors have claimed cross-reactivity between quinolones on the basis of clinical data. 6,9,[33][34][35][36][37][38] Our data support this notion because several patients reported a reaction with more than one quinolone (9/55 [16%]). Moreover, the majority of our patients revealed IgE toward more than one quinolone (24/30 [80%]).…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 65%
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Indeed, various authors have claimed cross-reactivity between quinolones on the basis of clinical data. 6,9,[33][34][35][36][37][38] Our data support this notion because several patients reported a reaction with more than one quinolone (9/55 [16%]). Moreover, the majority of our patients revealed IgE toward more than one quinolone (24/30 [80%]).…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 65%
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Our patients illustrate the polymorphism of clinical photosensitivity to systemic drugs, which was already apparent in previous cases with quinolones: bullous sunburn in a 25-year-old woman, occurring after an intense sun exposure in the snow (17), or erythematous and oedematous lesions with vesicles and/or bullae appearing a few days after beginning of treatment, mainly in old patients (15,16). This is certainly dependent on the complex mechanisms of photosensitivity, with acute phototoxic situations resembling acute sunburn reactions, even with bullae, as in the case described by Poh-Fitzpatrick (17) and in our patients 2, 5, 7 and 8; more eczematous lesions in cases where photallergy is suspected as in cases reported by Kurumaji and Shono (15) and Correia et al (16) and in our case 1.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 51%
“…Pathology performed in 4 of our patients clearly supports a phototoxic reaction with sunburn-like keratinocytes. In the case reported by Correia et al (16), however, histopathology and the study of the inflammatory cells of the liquid of the bullae (revealing a high percentage of Thelper lymphocytes) favours an immunologic reaction, with positive photopatch tests, with a cross-reaction with ciprofloxacin supporting photoallergy (16). Kurumaji and Shono had to perform a prior scarification in order to obtain positive reactions to this high molecular weight drug (15), which was not necessary in our case 1.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 63%
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Certain new 4-quinolones, especially enoxacin (ENX) with a naphthyridine ring and SPFX and LFLX with a quinolone ring, are well-known to cause photosensitivity (4)(5)(6)(7)(8). Photosensitivity induced by LFLX is thought to be due to both phototoxic and photoallergic mechanisms (4,9), photopatch testing with LFLX commonly being negative (10) Cross-photosensitivity to other quinolones has hardly ever been reported (5). An animal study indicated that LFLX had the highest phototoxic potential of the 4-quinolones, also caused photoallergy, and showed no cross-photosensitivity with other 4quinolones (11).…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 99%