Building information modelling (BIM) and the CDM regulations interoperability framework

Abstract

Purpose Building information modelling (BIM) has received wide coverage within the research, academic and industry communities over the last decade. Yet, its degree of integration with various industry standards in the architecture, engineering and construction sector varies extensively. An exploratory research approach explores the interoperability between the construction design and management (CDM) regulations and BIM. The paper aims to discuss this issue. Design/methodology/approach The research design comprised: a methodical “state-of-the-art” review of extant literature – exploring some 19 variables emerging from the literature review; detailed content analyses of the current CDM regime (CDM 2015); and conducting a “test” to map and determine the degree of interoperability between BIM and CDM. The study develops several meta-matrices and a framework for BIM and CDM interoperability. Findings New insight reveals that BIM provides a systematic approach for the discharge of CDM obligations. The framework developed is easily transferable into BIM common data environments (CDEs) and offers an expeditious discharge of CDM obligations. Research limitations/implications Some features of the developed BIM/CDM interoperability framework invite further tests to predicate the degree of discharge of CDM obligations. Duties related to provision of pre-construction information invite further research. Originality/value Little research provides insight into the interoperability of BIM and the CDM regulations. Therefore, this study contributes to the knowledge relating to the degree of interoperability of BIM in construction systems, processes and standards.

Key attributes of designers' competency for prevention through design (PtD) practices in construction: a review

“…For instance, the use of BIM could also provide checking for compliance with specific safety requirements, thus allowing for better decision of the design, which results in enhanced construction site safety (Melzner et al, 2013), as well as the aspect of sustainability of a project (Dewlaney and Hallowell, 2012). It is worth highlighting that even though these tools could facilitate PtD implementation, the study by Mzyece et al (2019) indicated that having BIM could only fulfil between 4 (18%) to 9 (41%) roles and responsibilities of designer and principal designer respectively, as stipulated in the CDM regulations.…”

A performance evaluation framework for construction and demolition waste management: stakeholder perspectives

“…Although the construction industry had a slow adoption of new and advanced technologies (Mzyece et al , 2019), technology and innovations were expected to improve both the quality of the construction sectors (Maskuriy et al , 2019). New tools such as three-dimensional (3D) imaging (Wei et al , 2019), 3D printing (Tay et al , 2017), four-dimensional (4D) simulation (Kunieda et al , 2019), building information modeling (BIM) (Mzyece et al , 2019), drones, virtual reality and augmented reality were all potential and applied for CDWM practices. These high technologies enabled the project stakeholders to simulate the generation of CDW, resulting in proper understanding and minimizing CDW.…”

“…Among high technology applications, BIM is a prominent approach for minimizing construction waste generation (Mzyece et al , 2019; Chiu and Lai, 2020). The nation-wide BIM implementation in Vietnam will begin in 2021 supported by the strong foundation of legal frameworks (Bui, 2019).…”

“…Based on different understandings of CDW in divergent project contexts, researchers have recommended various strategies to improve the management of CDW. A review of the literature on CDWM strategies shows five main streams, which are raise CDWM awareness among construction stakeholders (Kulatunga et al , 2006; Bourne and Walker, 2008; Ling and Nguyen, 2013; Yuan et al , 2013), supervise the performance of CDWM in the site (Lu and Yuan, 2010; Huang et al , 2018; Mahpour, 2018), apply penalty methods (Ling and Nguyen, 2013; Yuan, 2013b; Tam et al , 2014), integrate value management throughout the project life cycle (Karunasena et al , 2016; Othman and Abdelrahim, 2019) and apply new technologies in CDWM (Tay et al , 2017; Kunieda et al , 2019; Mzyece et al , 2019; Wei et al , 2019).…”

Building Information Modelling (BIM): Contractual Issues of Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) in Construction Projects

“…The lack of skilled technical expertise not only puts the digital data at risk but also hinders BIM from providing optimum benefits to its users. Plenty of studies reported the issue of software interoperability that stems from the use of various software that comes with different formats that are incompatible with each other, thus causing difficulties during the process of exchanging data among the team members (Philp & Frise, 2014;Mzyece, Ndekugri, & Ankrah, 2019;Costa & Sicilia, 2020;Utkucu & Sözer, 2020). This issue is severe particularly when a single integrated model working environment is involved, which is from BIM Level 2 and above when high level of interoperability is required during the data exchange process.…”