2004
DOI: 10.1007/0-306-48421-8_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Building Blocks for Reliable Complex Nonlinear Numerical Simulations

Abstract: This chapter describes some of the building blocks to ensure a higher level of confidence in the predictability and reliability (PAR) of numerical simulation of multiscale complex nonlinear problems. The focus is on relating PAR of numerical simulations with complex nonlinear phenomena of numerics. To isolate sources of numerical uncertainties, the possible discrepancy between the chosen partial differential equation (PDE) model and the real physics and/or experimental data is set aside. The discussion is rest… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, there is strong interest in understanding the physics of these flows. Furthermore, researchers, for example Yee [5], have published many works on spurious bifurcations of numerical solutions and their connection to initial data, grid fineness and time steps. In the framework of RTO/AVT-136 Task Group, a research has been performed, which included both, the physical and the numerical aspects of the problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, there is strong interest in understanding the physics of these flows. Furthermore, researchers, for example Yee [5], have published many works on spurious bifurcations of numerical solutions and their connection to initial data, grid fineness and time steps. In the framework of RTO/AVT-136 Task Group, a research has been performed, which included both, the physical and the numerical aspects of the problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This dual requirement to achieve both numerical stability and accuracy with zero or minimal use of numerical dissipation is most often conflicting for existing schemes that were designed for nonreacting flows. In addition to the minimization of numerical dissipation while maintaining numerical stability in compressible turbulence with strong shock, Yee & Sjögreen, Yee and Yee & Sweby [32,33,36,37] discussed a general framework for the design of such schemes. Yee & Sjögreen [41], Sjögreen & Yee [27,28,44] and Wang et al [30,31], and references cited therein present their recent progress on the subject.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This dual requirement to achieve both numerical stability and accuracy with zero or minimal use of numerical dissipation is most often conflicting for existing schemes that were designed for non-reacting flows. In addition to the minimization of numerical dissipation while maintaining numerical stability in compressible turbulence with strong shocks, Yee & Sjögreen, Yee and Yee & Sweby [65,66,62,61,68,69] discussed a general framework for the design of such schemes. Yee & Sjögreen [70], Sjögreen & Yee [53] and Wei et al [60] and references cited therein present their recent progress on the subject.…”
Section: Motivation and Objectivementioning
confidence: 99%