1963
DOI: 10.1097/00000542-196311000-00009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Buffer-Demand and pH of Local Anesthetic Solutions Containing Epinephrine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1). The EC 50 for capsaicin activation of TRPV1 was 19.2 Ϯ 0.5 M; consistent with previous findings, 14,30 the Hill coefficient was 2.1 Ϯ 0.1 (Hill four-parameter, nonlinear regression, P Ͻ 0.001), indicating cooperativity between binding sites to open the TRPV1 ionic pore. 31 While activation occurred at higher concentrations than in some previous studies, it is possible that the observed differences in capsaicin sensitivity are attributable to differences in the expression system used (e.g., oocytes vs. HEK293t cells), the TRPV1 isoforms studied (e.g., rat vs. human), or the procedure of drug application (e.g., we used an automated fast-switching perfusion system [see Materials and Methods and Drugs and Chemicals] and standardized drug applications to 10 s, ensuring a plateau # Software available at http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1). The EC 50 for capsaicin activation of TRPV1 was 19.2 Ϯ 0.5 M; consistent with previous findings, 14,30 the Hill coefficient was 2.1 Ϯ 0.1 (Hill four-parameter, nonlinear regression, P Ͻ 0.001), indicating cooperativity between binding sites to open the TRPV1 ionic pore. 31 While activation occurred at higher concentrations than in some previous studies, it is possible that the observed differences in capsaicin sensitivity are attributable to differences in the expression system used (e.g., oocytes vs. HEK293t cells), the TRPV1 isoforms studied (e.g., rat vs. human), or the procedure of drug application (e.g., we used an automated fast-switching perfusion system [see Materials and Methods and Drugs and Chemicals] and standardized drug applications to 10 s, ensuring a plateau # Software available at http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…29 In general, pain upon injection of LAs is a wellknown phenomenon and often a source of discomfort for patients undergoing local anesthesia. 49 One possible mechanism may be the low pH of some LA formulations, 50 because TRPV1 is considered the main transducing receptor system for proton-induced excitation of nociceptive sensory neurons. 28,51,52 However, the drug-containing solutions in our study were titrated to a pH of 7.4, and previous studies have suggested that LAs themselves may produce pain upon injection by directly activating TRPV1.…”
Section: Pain Medicinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specimens (50 μL) were taken from the open/exposed set at 0, 1, 4, 8, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours, while specimens from the closed/dark set were taken at 0, 24, and 72 hours. Following measurement of pH each specimen was mixed with 5 mL of 0.1M HClO 4 to stabilize the epinephrine and prevent further degradation 3,8 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because both lidocaine and epinephrine are unstable and relatively insoluble at physiologic pH, they are commercially stored with citric or hydrochloric acid to lower their pH. Storing these drugs at a pH of 3.5 to 5.0 prevents degradation of light‐sensitive epinephrine to adenochrome 3 . Unfortunately, the acidic pH of local anesthetic agents produces a great deal of patient discomfort during its infiltration.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The addition of epinephrine and the necessary preservatives decreases the pH of the solution and, therefore, increases the potential beneficial effect of buffering (13,14,20,21). The literature should be viewed with this in mind, and clinical application and future research tailored accordingly.…”
Section: (3) Error Bars Represent 95% Cismentioning
confidence: 99%