2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.04.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Buckling analysis of non-prismatic columns: A rigid multibody approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the same line of study, columns with variable inertia (trigonometric-varied inertia column) iteration-perturbation method was applied and obtained results were compared with the result obtained by modelling the same column in ANSYS by Afsharfard and Farshidianfar [30]. Later on, detailed work was reported by Nikolić and Šalinić [31], wherein they assumed that the column is doubly symmetric to apply the method of rigid elements in order to perform buckling analysis of columns with continuously varying cross section and multistepped columns under different boundary conditions.…”
Section: Self-bucklingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the same line of study, columns with variable inertia (trigonometric-varied inertia column) iteration-perturbation method was applied and obtained results were compared with the result obtained by modelling the same column in ANSYS by Afsharfard and Farshidianfar [30]. Later on, detailed work was reported by Nikolić and Šalinić [31], wherein they assumed that the column is doubly symmetric to apply the method of rigid elements in order to perform buckling analysis of columns with continuously varying cross section and multistepped columns under different boundary conditions.…”
Section: Self-bucklingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method also serves an additional advantage that the boundary condition can be introduced without any extra calculation. However, the limitation of this method lies in the discretisation of elastic segments with rigid segments [31].…”
Section: Self-bucklingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In result, it was stated than proposed FPD buckling theory for beams is able to give a good prediction, while the conventional buckling theory (Timoshenko & Gere, 2009) and conventional numerical method (Dassault-Systèmes, 2010) yield unacceptable results (in some cases with 70% error for a three-point-bending beam). In (Nikolić & Šalinić, 2017) authors presented a method of buckling analysis of non-prismatic columns based on rigid element method. Authors derived a general form of the characteristic equation, which enabled to perform buckling analysis of columns with continuously varying, doubly symmetric cross-section and multiple-stepped columns under different boundary conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of constant efforts to minimize the weight of mechanical systems and maximize their strength, of great importance is the issue of optimization of such systems. Shape optimization issues can be found, among others in the works of Drazumeric and Kosel, 2012, Ruta and Szybiński, 2015, Tsiatas, 2010, Krużelecki and Barski, 2008, Bochenek and Tajs-Zielińska, 2008, Nikolic and Salinic, 2017, Szmidla and Jurczyńska, 2015and Szmidla and Wawszczak, 2008, where the application of different algorithms or proprietary solutions are proposed. This article is a response to the search for optimal shapes of slender mechanical systems subjected to a conservative load.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%