2015
DOI: 10.1098/rsfs.2015.0019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bubbles with shock waves and ultrasound: a review

Abstract: The study of the interaction of bubbles with shock waves and ultrasound is sometimes termed ‘acoustic cavitation'. It is of importance in many biomedical applications where sound waves are applied. The use of shock waves and ultrasound in medical treatments is appealing because of their non-invasiveness. In this review, we present a variety of acoustics–bubble interactions, with a focus on shock wave–bubble interaction and bubble cloud phenomena. The dynamics of a single spherically oscillating bubble is rathe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
64
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
2
64
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, CT is a useful tool to evaluate liver cancer therapy and tumor necrosis, and to measure the exact area of a tumor. The present study used 20 kHz US, which is the lowest frequency point on the US wave (30). This frequency was selected as higher sound frequencies accelerate the vibration of the MB in the sound field while reducing the amplitude (31).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, CT is a useful tool to evaluate liver cancer therapy and tumor necrosis, and to measure the exact area of a tumor. The present study used 20 kHz US, which is the lowest frequency point on the US wave (30). This frequency was selected as higher sound frequencies accelerate the vibration of the MB in the sound field while reducing the amplitude (31).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The acoustic pressure required to initiate inertial cavitation can be higher than the pressure required for stable cavitation (Bader and Holland 2013) and also depends on fluid properties and the cavitation nuclei (Apfel 1997). Inertial cavitation forms microjets (Ohl et al 2015) that can damage or deform the biofilms (Goh et al 2015). Administration of cavitation nuclei can reduce the cavitation threshold (Bader and Holland 2013).…”
Section: Experimental Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At a higher pressure (0.7 MPa, 1 MHz, 50-ms pulse), a 7.4-mm SonoVue microbubble had an extremely large radial excursion (R max = 27.3 mm) with a liquid jet within that led to mechanical dislodgement of the bacteria from the biofilm. The direction of a jet with respect to the surface of the biofilm depends on the elasticity of the surface (Ohl et al 2015). Accordingly, jet formation can create substantial shear force leading to either an indentation or an invagination of the surface (Chen et al 2011(Chen et al , 2012.…”
Section: Experimental Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, combined treatment with paclitaxel-loaded NBs and ESWs reduced cell migration of more than 85% with respect to treatment with paclitaxel alone; whereas docetaxel-loaded NBs and ESWs reduced cell migration of more than 82% with respect to treatment with docetaxel alone. The enhancement of cytotoxicity and migration inhibition may be the consequence of cavitation which occurs when acoustic waves propagate into fluids [31]. In fact, cavitation determines both transient permeabilization of plasma membranes, thus allowing drug penetration into the cells, as well as the perturbation of the NBs, resulting in the intracellular drug release.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%