2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10803-015-2664-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brief Report: Reduced Prioritization of Facial Threat in Adults with Autism

Abstract: Typically-developing (TD) adults detect angry faces more efficiently within a crowd than non-threatening faces. Prior studies of this social threat superiority effect (TSE) in ASD using tasks consisting of schematic faces and homogeneous crowds have produced mixed results. Here, we employ a more ecologically-valid test of the social TSE and find evidence of a reduced social TSE in adults with ASD (n = 21) relative to TD controls (n = 28). Unlike TD participants, the ASD group failed to show the normative advan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 42 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the seemingly reduced task demands, findings have also been inconsistent. Nonverbal discrimination tasks, requiring participants to indicate whether the stimuli within a pair display the same or different emotions, have reported group differences with human faces (e.g., Greimel et al, 2014;Sasson, Shasteen, & Pinkham, 2016b;Vannetzel, Chaby, Cautru, Cohen, & Plaza, 2011), but not with speech prosody (e.g., Lindström et al, 2018). Nonverbal matching tasks, where participants are shown an emotional stimulus and then choose a stimulus from a set that displays the same expression, have found group differences (e.g., Philip et al, 2010;Tanaka et al, 2012).…”
Section: Task Demandmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the seemingly reduced task demands, findings have also been inconsistent. Nonverbal discrimination tasks, requiring participants to indicate whether the stimuli within a pair display the same or different emotions, have reported group differences with human faces (e.g., Greimel et al, 2014;Sasson, Shasteen, & Pinkham, 2016b;Vannetzel, Chaby, Cautru, Cohen, & Plaza, 2011), but not with speech prosody (e.g., Lindström et al, 2018). Nonverbal matching tasks, where participants are shown an emotional stimulus and then choose a stimulus from a set that displays the same expression, have found group differences (e.g., Philip et al, 2010;Tanaka et al, 2012).…”
Section: Task Demandmentioning
confidence: 99%