Bridging the Gap between Theory and Practice in Integrated Care: The Case of the Diabetic Foot Pathway in Tuscany

Abstract

Introduction and Background: As diabetic foot (DF) care benefits from integration, monitoring geographic variations in lower limb Major Amputation rate enables to highlight potential lack of Integrated Care. In Tuscany (Italy), these DF outcomes were good on average but they varied within the region. In order to stimulate an improvement process towards integration, the project aimed to shift health professionals’ focus on the geographic variation issue, promote the Population Medicine approach, and engage professionals in a community of practice.Method: Three strategies were thus carried out: the use of a transparent performance evaluation system based on benchmarking; the use of patient stories and benchmarking analyses on outcomes, service utilization and costs that cross-checked delivery- and population-based perspectives; the establishment of a stable community of professionals to discuss data and practices.Results: The project enabled professionals to shift their focus on geographic variation and to a joint accountability on outcomes and costs for the entire patient pathways. Organizational best practices and gaps in integration were identified and improvement actions towards Integrated Care were implemented.Conclusion and Discussion: For the specific category of care pathways whose geographic variation is related to a lack of Integrated Care, a comprehensive strategy to improve outcomes and reduce equity gaps by diffusing integration should be carried out.

Performance of care for end‐of‐life cancer patients in Tuscany: The interplay between place of care, aggressive treatments, opioids, and place of death. A retrospective cohort study

“…24 An advanced debate on the appropriateness and quality of EOL care has been possible thanks to the availability of large-scale administrative data on healthcare service use and the introduction of performance measurement systems in the healthcare sector as well as for specific clinical pathways. 20,[25][26][27] Performance indicators or national standards to evaluate the appropriateness and quality of EOL care are also promoted both by health systems and by the professional community. A global measure is the Quality of Death Index, which ranks countries based on palliative care availability, affordability, and quality.…”

“…Moreover, the socioeconomic characteristics of individuals, their functional and care needs, and their support networks can have an impact together with local care practice patterns and capacity of healthcare services . An advanced debate on the appropriateness and quality of EOL care has been possible thanks to the availability of large‐scale administrative data on healthcare service use and the introduction of performance measurement systems in the healthcare sector as well as for specific clinical pathways …”

Reputations count: why benchmarking performance is improving health care across the world

“…Examples of improvements through benchmarking include how reductions were made in diabetic-related rates of foot amputations (Nuti et al, 2016) and improving the communication processes between patients and clinicians through health-professional using results from patient surveys (Murante et al, 2014).…”

Health system performance assessment in small countries: The case study of Latvia

“…To do that, according to a literature review conducted by Leggat et al, it is important that the performance management model incorporates the fundamental values, attitudes, and information needs of the users of the performance indicators, eg, citizens, patients, professionals, and the entities participating to the governance of the health system. The involvement of health professionals is considered particularly important in order to provide insights and suggestions (eg, new indicators and revision of existing indicators) in a continuous fine‐tuning process …”