2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1548-1352.2009.01054.x
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts

Bridging Psychiatric and Anthropological Approaches: The Case of “Nerves” in the United States

Abstract: Psychiatrists and anthropologists have taken distinct analytic approaches when confronted with differences between emic and etic models for distress: psychiatrists have translated folk models into diagnostic categories whereas anthropologists have emphasized culture-specific meanings of illness. The rift between psychiatric and anthropological research keeps "individual disease" and "culture" disconnected and thus hinders the study of interrelationships between mental health and culture. In this article we bri… Show more

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
10
3
1
0

Citation Types

0
5
0
0

Year Published

Range
2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2
2
2

Relationship

1
13

Authors

Journals

citations

Cited by 14 publications

(5 citation statements)
references

References 129 publications

0
5
0
0
Order By: Relevance
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…For instance, the question of duration remains (i.e., does tension refer to a passing feeling or a more long-term state?). Similar nonspecific categories such as ''nerves'' have been noted in U.S. populations (Dahlberg et al 2009); a cross-cultural comparison that considers ''tension'' not as an expression for a psychiatric condition but as a distinct category could be a fruitful future direction and is, in any case, an important step toward generating a locally derived understanding of mental health and illness.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 72%