2005
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)1084-0702(2005)10:3(247)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bridge Scour and Substructure Deterioration: Case Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It typically results in a loss in foundation stiffness that can compromise structural safety. With regard to scour, visual inspections involve the use of divers to inspect the condition of foundation elements (Avent and Alawady 2005). These types of inspections can be expensive and can have limited effectiveness as inspecting the condition of the foundation can be dangerous in times of flooding, when the risk of scour is highest.…”
Section: Bridge Scourmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It typically results in a loss in foundation stiffness that can compromise structural safety. With regard to scour, visual inspections involve the use of divers to inspect the condition of foundation elements (Avent and Alawady 2005). These types of inspections can be expensive and can have limited effectiveness as inspecting the condition of the foundation can be dangerous in times of flooding, when the risk of scour is highest.…”
Section: Bridge Scourmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, corrosion of the pile cross-section also contributes to the pile buckling failure. For example, corrosion resulted in approximately 44% reduction of cross-section of timber piles in the Hatchie River Bridge, (Thompson 1990), and 50% reduction of cross-section of steel HP piles in the I-10 Bridge over the Jourdan River in Mississippi (Avent and Alawady 2005). In terms of steel HP shapes, buckling can occur globally (flexural buckling) or locally (local buckling).…”
Section: Vertical Failurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following recent failures (Maddison 2012), scour monitoring is receiving increasing interest among asset owners. Traditionally, diving inspections were adopted (Avent and Alawady 2005); however these tend to be subjective, labor-intensive and dangerous to undertake during flooding, when the likelihood of scour occurrence is highest. Moreover, as scour holes tend to refill with sediment upon subsidence of floodwaters, this can pose challenges for the success of visual-based assessment procedures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%