2019
DOI: 10.1007/bf03544450
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract: The Cipo Cinclodes Cinclodes espinhacensis is a recently described furnariid endemic to the campos rupestres of Serra do Cipó, southern Espinhaço Range, southeastern Brazil. It is an "Endangered" species and its natural history is poorly known. We studied the Cipo Cinclodes breeding biology at Serra do Breu, where we found six nests on rock outcrops in 2009 and 2012. At least one nest was reused in different years. Breeding season was from September (nest building) to January (dependent juveniles). Nests were … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
4
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Hatchlings of C. pabsti are similar to their congeneric species with respect to the eyes, ears, skin color, distribution of natal down feathers (neossoptiles), and reliance on parental care. This includes C. comechingonus, C. olrogi (Salvador & Salvador, 2012), and C. espinhacencis (Costa et al, 2019). The body mass of C. comechingonus nestlings ranged from 4.0 to 4.3 g. This is lower than the average egg mass (5.1 ± 0.3 g) and mean mass of C. pabsti nestlings recorded in this study (6.0 ± 1.0 g).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 53%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Hatchlings of C. pabsti are similar to their congeneric species with respect to the eyes, ears, skin color, distribution of natal down feathers (neossoptiles), and reliance on parental care. This includes C. comechingonus, C. olrogi (Salvador & Salvador, 2012), and C. espinhacencis (Costa et al, 2019). The body mass of C. comechingonus nestlings ranged from 4.0 to 4.3 g. This is lower than the average egg mass (5.1 ± 0.3 g) and mean mass of C. pabsti nestlings recorded in this study (6.0 ± 1.0 g).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 53%
“…Alternatively, the reuse percentage ranged from 26.9% in the 2008-2009 breeding season to 40.4% in the 2010-2011 breeding season, if the reuse between reproductive events within the same breeding season is considered. This is lower than the proportion of nesting cavities reused by C. fuscus (72.2%) across multiple seasons, recorded by Ojeda (2016), but higher than that used by C. espinhacensis (25.0% (one of four)) in both 2009 and 2012 (Costa et al, 2019). The reuse of nesting cavities, both within and between breeding seasons, could be a strategy to reduce the amount of time and energy spent excavating new cavities (Vergara et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 3 more Smart Citations