2004
DOI: 10.2979/nws.2004.16.1.157
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Breaking into the Guildmasters' Club: What We Know About Women Science and Engineering Department Chairs at AAU Universities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These recommendations for change highlight the importance of the chair or department leader in creating a positive climate for women faculty. Further, they require a chair who is open‐minded to women as science faculty, and to the possibility that women's experiences and perceptions of the department may differ from theirs (given that most science department chairs are men; Niemeier & Gonzales, 2004). Thus, it is critical that department leaders are selected in a way that ensures that women faculty have an influence on decisions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These recommendations for change highlight the importance of the chair or department leader in creating a positive climate for women faculty. Further, they require a chair who is open‐minded to women as science faculty, and to the possibility that women's experiences and perceptions of the department may differ from theirs (given that most science department chairs are men; Niemeier & Gonzales, 2004). Thus, it is critical that department leaders are selected in a way that ensures that women faculty have an influence on decisions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specific difficulties faced by female science faculty include less influence and fewer opportunities to hold leadership positions (Carr, Szalacha, Barnett, Caswell, & Inui, 2003a; Niemeier & Gonzalez, 2004; Wright et al, 2003), slower advancement and less representation at top levels (Valian, 2004), more social isolation (Wright et al, 2003; Xie & Shauman, 2003), and (according to some indicators) lower levels of productivity (Sonnert & Holton, 1996), compared to their male counterparts. Various explanations for gender differences in science have been offered apart from differences in ability; these include the pipeline theory (i.e., there are not yet enough women in the sciences for parity to have been reached; Wright et al, 2003), work–family conflict (Wright et al, 2003), and gender differences in personal qualities relevant to science, such as professional styles and goals (Sonnert & Holton, 1996).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, research demonstrates that women are particularly underrepresented among the administrative ranks. Comprehensive data on the sex composition of department chairs are difficult to come by, yet an American Association of Universities report indicated that, in 2000, less than 20 percent of department chairs at a large sample of research universities were women (Niemeier and González, ). The role of the department chair is significant for at least two reasons.…”
Section: Women As Full Professors and Administratorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, it is a critical leadership position given that department chairs represent their faculty and departments to the institution and profession, shape departmental culture, and are effectively the day‐to‐day decision makers in matters including (but not limited to) budget and resource allocation, class and teaching schedules, tenure and promotion, and emergent and routine departmental problems (Bowman ). Second, the chair position is generally seen as the stepping stone to a career in academic administration (Niemeier and González, ). Thus, any inequality we see at this level repeats itself higher up the administrative chain.…”
Section: Women As Full Professors and Administratorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation