2016
DOI: 10.1111/amet.12305
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bread-and-butter politics: Democratic disenchantment and everyday politics on an English council estate

Abstract: Despite evidence of widespread disenchantment with formal politics among England's impoverished sectors, people on the margins continue to engage with elected representatives on their own terms. On English council estates (housing projects), residents mediate their experiences of an alien and distant political system by drawing local politicians into localized networks of support and care. While this allows residents to voice demands for “bread and butter,” personalized alliances with politicians rarely transl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other limitations of the present study include our focus on an identities approach to the exclusion of other factors that may have influenced voting intentions, including factors derived from a political approach (e.g., attitudes towards incumbent political parties) and a utilitarian approach (e.g., financial or job security). This is important because our work cannot speak to other issues that may have influence voting intentions in our sample; that is, we cannot draw any conclusions about other, unmeasured motivations of voting intentions (e.g., that citizens used the referendum to reject politics as they know it; Koch, ). Even from the point‐of‐view of an identities approach, there may have been other neglected variables that further mediated or even suppressed our effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other limitations of the present study include our focus on an identities approach to the exclusion of other factors that may have influenced voting intentions, including factors derived from a political approach (e.g., attitudes towards incumbent political parties) and a utilitarian approach (e.g., financial or job security). This is important because our work cannot speak to other issues that may have influence voting intentions in our sample; that is, we cannot draw any conclusions about other, unmeasured motivations of voting intentions (e.g., that citizens used the referendum to reject politics as they know it; Koch, ). Even from the point‐of‐view of an identities approach, there may have been other neglected variables that further mediated or even suppressed our effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tony was working as a bus driver and he was also the councillor for a local independent party that had gathered much support by campaigning about crime and public safety issues (Koch 2016). One day, I walked across the estate with Alice, Linda's fourteen-year-old daughter, from their house to the bus stop.…”
Section: The Security Gap On a Council Estatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, there are reasons to caution against calls for 'professionalization'. In a situation where masses of people already feel removed from what they experience as a distant and hostile system, excluding these same people as populist from further from public debate is likely to increase deep-seated disenchantments with their elected representatives (Koch, 2016;Lerman and Weaver, 2014). Even worse, such a move would validate further shifts to technocratic and managerial modes of decision-making that, according to some scholars at least, have hollowed out democracy of its substantial meaning and resulted in a 'postdemocratic' state (Crouch, 2004;Ranciere, 1998).…”
Section: Conclusion: Democracy Punitivism and Social Ordermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But even within networks of friends and kin, moral evaluations were made. A friend or a kin member could be accused of being selfish and of abusing one's generosity and trust where they failed to live up to locally expected standards of sociality (Koch, 2016). This was particularly evident in situations of conflict where demands for loyalty and support came most acutely to the fore.…”
Section: State Failurementioning
confidence: 99%