2018
DOI: 10.1590/0034-7329201800109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brazil, the United States and the Tehran Declaration

Abstract: Este é um artigo publicado em acesso aberto e distribuído sob os termos da Licença de Atribuição Creative Commons, que permite uso irrestrito, distribuição e reprodução em qualquer meio, desde que o autor e a fonte originais sejam creditados. AbstractBrazil has claimed the status of a key player within the international arena for the past decade, particularly during the two administrations of Lula da Silva (2003)(2004)(2005)(2006)(2007)(2008)(2009)(2010). The Brazilian foreign policy team acted in relation to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is possible to argue that there were also communication failures during the negotiations, as Brazil felt its efforts were being supported by Obama, who was in contact with Lula, while others within the US government, such as secretary of State Hillary Clinton and secretary of Defence Robert Gates, were strongly against any deals with Iran (Oliveira and Santos 2018). Brazil's attempt to get involved with matters of Middle Eastern politics was seen as a negative step by Washington DC., which was suspisicous of Brazil's support for the Iranian nuclear program, with the US ambassador to Brazil calling Brazil's diplomacy in the Middle East "clumsy," and alleged that Brazil's official statements were normally unhelpful (Oliveira and Santos 2018;Amorim 2010).…”
Section: The Failed Tehran Declarationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is possible to argue that there were also communication failures during the negotiations, as Brazil felt its efforts were being supported by Obama, who was in contact with Lula, while others within the US government, such as secretary of State Hillary Clinton and secretary of Defence Robert Gates, were strongly against any deals with Iran (Oliveira and Santos 2018). Brazil's attempt to get involved with matters of Middle Eastern politics was seen as a negative step by Washington DC., which was suspisicous of Brazil's support for the Iranian nuclear program, with the US ambassador to Brazil calling Brazil's diplomacy in the Middle East "clumsy," and alleged that Brazil's official statements were normally unhelpful (Oliveira and Santos 2018;Amorim 2010).…”
Section: The Failed Tehran Declarationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Turkey's fear of entrapment in a confrontation with Russia, its main energy supplier, increased with the perceived failure of Obama's 'reset' policy (Guney, 2016). Turkey also resented Obama's rejection of the Turkey-Brazil deal to mediate the Iranian conflict (de Oliveira & dos Santos, 2018). Both Turkey and Brazil 'felt betrayed' and accused the West of trying to prevent their rising power in the region (de Oliveira & dos Santos, 2018).…”
Section: Obama's Model Partnership and Trump's Transactional Alliancementioning
confidence: 99%