2015
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0128019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Branchfall as a Demographic Filter for Epiphyte Communities: Lessons from Forest Floor-Based Sampling

Abstract: Local variation in the abundance and richness of vascular epiphytes is often attributed to environmental characteristics such as substrate and microclimate. Less is known, however, about the impacts of tree and branch turnover on epiphyte communities. To address this issue, we surveyed branches and epiphytes found on the forest floor in 96 transects in two forests (Atlantic rainforest in Brazil and Caribbean rainforest in Panama). In the Brazilian forest, we additionally distinguished between edge and core stu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
32
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This is unrealistic as environmental factors such as light, water, and nutrient inputs, as well as branch (or twig) diameters, will differ with the location within the canopy, leading to height-specific rates of mortality (Zotz 2007). Furthermore, species interactions will depend on spatial distances (e.g., local reproduction by individual species are more likely in empty sites next to sites that these species currently occupy) and will be spatially correlated (e.g., mortality will be spatially concentrated when whole branches break) (Cabral et al 2015). Taking such spatially explicit processes into account potentially could increase the variance of the trends observed in the current simulations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is unrealistic as environmental factors such as light, water, and nutrient inputs, as well as branch (or twig) diameters, will differ with the location within the canopy, leading to height-specific rates of mortality (Zotz 2007). Furthermore, species interactions will depend on spatial distances (e.g., local reproduction by individual species are more likely in empty sites next to sites that these species currently occupy) and will be spatially correlated (e.g., mortality will be spatially concentrated when whole branches break) (Cabral et al 2015). Taking such spatially explicit processes into account potentially could increase the variance of the trends observed in the current simulations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Species with long creeping rhizomes were counted as patches. Epiphytes were sampled up to heights of 8 m with trimming poles and recorded at greater heights using binoculars, climbing lower parts of trees, and searching recently fallen trees and branches within and adjacent to the plots (Gradstein, Nadkarni, Krömer, Holz, & Nöske, 2003; Sarmento Cabral et al, 2015).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies describe the existence of host preference, greater abundance and richness of epiphytes in few host species and host limitation, low abundance of epiphytes in few species of host as a result of limiting factors (ter Steege & Cornelissen 1989, Vergara-Torres et al 2010. It has been proposed that host preference and limitation of vascular epiphytes species, could be associated with the structural characteristics of phorophytes, including branching patterns, physical and chemical bark characteristics and water absorbing capacity of the bark (Migenis & Ackerman 1993, Bernal et al 2005, López-Villalobos et al 2008, Vergara-Torres et al 2010, Ruíz-Cordova et al 2014, Cabral et al 2015. In addition, host preference in orchids may be governed by the distribution of their mycorrhizal symbionts that are needed for seed germination (Arditti 1992, Hietz & Hietz-Seifert 1995, Tupac-Otero et al 2004.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%