2008
DOI: 10.1117/12.778743
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Branch point detection and correction using the branch point potential method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, under the regime of strong turbulence, Shack-Hartmann-based solutions may fail to guarantee a stable fiber coupling. For instance, in low-earth-orbit (LEO) satellite downlinks, strong turbulence may induce intense scintillation and phase wavefront singularities (branch points), thus, seriously limiting the performance of such sensor [9][10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, under the regime of strong turbulence, Shack-Hartmann-based solutions may fail to guarantee a stable fiber coupling. For instance, in low-earth-orbit (LEO) satellite downlinks, strong turbulence may induce intense scintillation and phase wavefront singularities (branch points), thus, seriously limiting the performance of such sensor [9][10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By convention the (i,j)th pixel is the top left of the four pixels and the vortex is placed there, a more exact position of the branch point could be established by further numerical methods but we know of no standard technique. The overall robustness of the contour sum method has been questioned under heavy noise conditions [18,21,32] making it problematic to use this with the slope discrepancy technique and therefore we have decided to use a different method [21,22]. The issue of noise with respect to the contour sum method is raised because it only does a gradient circulation around a closed loop of four phase gradients, whereas the branch point potential method described below employs all of the available slope data by using a least squares reconstruction method to calculate the potential function.…”
Section: Vortex Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two major difficulties in this field are the accurate and reliable detection of the vortices in the wavefront and the subsequent faithful reconstruction of the measured wavefront. Different reconstructors have been suggested [13,14] and some of these have been shown to work in laboratory conditions [15,16], while others work in theory but are impractical in reality [17,18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 Conversely, a new approach which utilizes subaperture irradiance pattern beam spread to identify branch points has recently been introduced. 32 While other approaches exist, [33][34][35][36][37] these two approaches will be the ones emphasized in this paper. Here, the circulation of phase gradients approach and beam-spread approach will be compared using a simple optical-vortex model, wave-optics simulations, as well as experimental data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%