2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.01.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brain mechanisms underlying the effects of aging on different aspects of selective attention

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
48
1
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
48
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it remains to be determined whether (1) additional inter-network FC is a compensatory mechanism which is beneficial for brain function in response to the typical age-related reduction of intra-network FC; or (2) a reduction in RSN specificity results in interference between network activity, which is not conducive to efficient task performance and may underlie less efficient processing sometimes seen in older adults (Baltes and Lindenberger, 1997). A series of studies by Geerligs et al (2014c,d) suggested that although increased inter-network connectivity during tasks may be compensatory, older adults reach a ‘resource ceiling’ which results in age-related deficits in performance in more difficult conditions. However, they also reported that although reductions in intra-network FC were associated with poorer performance on cognitive tasks, additional inter-network FC was not always associated with better performance (Geerligs et al, 2014a).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it remains to be determined whether (1) additional inter-network FC is a compensatory mechanism which is beneficial for brain function in response to the typical age-related reduction of intra-network FC; or (2) a reduction in RSN specificity results in interference between network activity, which is not conducive to efficient task performance and may underlie less efficient processing sometimes seen in older adults (Baltes and Lindenberger, 1997). A series of studies by Geerligs et al (2014c,d) suggested that although increased inter-network connectivity during tasks may be compensatory, older adults reach a ‘resource ceiling’ which results in age-related deficits in performance in more difficult conditions. However, they also reported that although reductions in intra-network FC were associated with poorer performance on cognitive tasks, additional inter-network FC was not always associated with better performance (Geerligs et al, 2014a).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is termed proactive as it reflects the ability of the attentional system to bias perceptual processing in favor of an upcoming target before it is presented. In contrast, reactive attentional control refers to resolving interference between target and potentially distracting information at later stages of the processing hierarchy (Geerligs et al, 2014). …”
Section: Impact Of Dorsal Visual Stream Declines (Eeg)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With aging, neuronal loss and small vessel alteration lead to progressive and subtle white matter changes associated with cognitive decline in the elderly (Pantoni 2010;Xiong and Mok 2011). Cognitive decline affects predominantly many executive functions but not all (Geerligs et al 2014), and brain changes seem to distribute unevenly, affecting predominantly the frontal region (Bishop et al 2010;Curiati et al 2009;Draganski et al 2011;Giorgio et al 2010;Good et al 2001;Moscovitch 1992;Raz et al 2000Raz et al , 2004West 1996) suggesting that the latest developed brain areas are especially susceptible to show an accelerated aging (Tamnes et al 2010). Previous cross-sectional studies using tract-specific measurements confirmed this ''frontal lobe hypothesis'' for the white matter by revealing a slow decrease with aging in the FA for frontal callosal tracts (Hsu et al 2008;Hasan et al 2009b;Lebel et al 2010;Bastin et al 2008;Michielse et al 2010) and for long tracts connecting the frontal lobe (Jones et al 2006;Hasan et al 2010Hasan et al , 2009a, affecting more prominently the frontal portion of these tracts (Davis et al 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%