1999
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1034(199901/06)34:1/2<159::aid-gj819>3.0.co;2-z
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
Braided river deposits related to progressive Miocene surface uplift in Kahraman Maraş area, SE Turkey
Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Select...
16
4
0
0
Citation Types
1
11
0
0
Year Published
2002
2024
Publication Types
Select...
18
1
1
Relationship
0
20
Authors
Journals
Cited by 20 publications
(12 citation statements)
References 16 publications
1
11
0
0
“…Sedimentation resumed during the Aquitanian to Burdigalian (Early Miocene) with deposition of conglomerates and mudstones. In the Kahramanmaraş area, Derman & Atalik (1993) and Derman (1999) assigned a lower Miocene age to the about 1 km thick series of fluvial deposits, which precede the thick flysch deposits. We, however, have no age constraints on the fluvial deposits and can therefore not confirm an Early Miocene age.…”
Section: Q16supporting
confidence: 72%
“…Sedimentation resumed during the Aquitanian to Burdigalian (Early Miocene) with deposition of conglomerates and mudstones. In the Kahramanmaraş area, Derman & Atalik (1993) and Derman (1999) assigned a lower Miocene age to the about 1 km thick series of fluvial deposits, which precede the thick flysch deposits. We, however, have no age constraints on the fluvial deposits and can therefore not confirm an Early Miocene age.…”
Section: Q16supporting
confidence: 72%
“…2). This basin was also called the Lice trough (Dewey et al 1986;Karig & Kozlu 1990;Derman & Atalik 1993;Derman 1999). Eocene deposits in the Kahramanmaraş area are part of the Arabian Platform (Robertson et al 2004).…”
Section: Geological Setting Of the Kahramanmaraş Basinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding individual examples, the claim by Allen et al [2004] that no uplift has occurred in the core of the Greater Caucasus since 12 Ma is at odds with the local reported presence, at ∼3500 m above sea level on ∼4000 m high mountains, of marine sediment of Late Sarmatian (∼10 Ma) age [ Budagov , 1964], as previously noted [ Mitchell and Westaway , 1999]. Their claim that no uplift occurred in SE Turkey before 12 Ma is at odds with abundant local evidence that this region adjusted during the middle Miocene from being submerged to subaerial [e.g., Westaway and Arger , 1996; Derman , 1999; Arger et al , 2000]. Their claim that no uplift has occurred in Turkey (except SE Turkey) since 12 Ma is also at odds with the abundant evidence of Quaternary uplift throughout most of Turkey from river terrace staircases.…”
Section: Relationships Between Vertical and Horizontal Crustal Motionsmentioning
confidence: 96%
