2000
DOI: 10.1002/1099-1387(200009)6:9<440::aid-psc280>3.0.co;2-k
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts

Bradykinin analogues with ?-amino acid substitutions reveal subtle differences in substrate specificity between the endopeptidases EC 3.4.24.15 and EC 3.4.24.16

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
21
1
0
0

Citation Types

0
4
0
0

Year Published

Range
2001
2001
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
15
7

Relationship

4
18

Authors

Journals

citations

Cited by 22 publications

(4 citation statements)
references

References 14 publications

0
4
0
0
Order By: Relevance
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…[9,10] Besides pure β-peptides, it has been shown that α/βpeptides in which the β-amino acid replacement does not change the relative orientation of side chains around the scissile bond (Scheme 1), thus mimicking α-peptide environment, are still stable against a wide range of proteases. [9] This was confirmed by many examples of peptide analogs where a strategic replacement of a single P1' amino acid by a βhomolog (Scheme 1b) abolished the activity of pepsin, chymotrypsin, plasmepsin II, [11] metalloproteinase EP24.15 and EP24.16, [12] neprylisin, [13] pronase E [14] or ACE-2, [15] and improved the stability of the whole peptide. With this kind of substitution, minimal modifications are possible in order to provide peptide stability, while maintaining α-peptide structural and spatial characteristics required for interaction with receptor.…”
Section: Introduction
mentioning
confidence: 84%