bpfbox

Abstract

Process confinement is a key requirement for workloads in the cloud and in other contexts. Existing process confinement mechanisms on Linux, however, are complex and inflexible because they are implemented using a combination of primitive abstractions (e.g., namespaces, cgroups) and complex security mechanisms (e.g., SELinux, AppArmor) that were designed for purposes beyond basic process confinement. We argue that simple, efficient, and flexible confinement can be better implemented today using eBPF, an emerging technology for safely extending the Linux kernel. We present a proof-of-concept confinement application, bpfbox, that uses less than 2000 lines of kernelspace code and allows for confinement at the userspace function, system call, LSM hook, and kernelspace function boundaries-something that no existing process confinement mechanism can do. Further, it does so using a policy language simple enough to use for ad-hoc confinement purposes. This paper presents the motivation, design, implementation, and benchmarks of bpfbox, including a sample web server confinement policy. CCS CONCEPTS • Security and privacy → Operating systems security; Access control.

A System for Bounding the Execution Cost of Web Assembly Functions

“…Researcher and developers have proposed and produced a wide range of innovative solutions based on eBPF. Examples include a sandboxing facility for containers [26],…”