2020
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.125.021301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bounds on Lorentz Invariance Violation from MAGIC Observation of GRB 190114C

Abstract: Very recently, the Large High Altitude Air Shower Observatory (LHAASO) reported the observation of the very early TeV afterglow of the brightest-of-all-time GRB 221009A, recording the highest photon statistics in the TeV band ever from a gamma-ray burst. We use this unique observation to place stringent constraints on an energy dependence of the speed of light in vacuum, a manifestation of Lorentz invariance violation (LIV) predicted by some quantum gravity (QG) theories. Our results show that the 95% confiden… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
36
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The Lorentz invariance is violated as z > 1 but it assumes that there is a foliated diffeomorphism invariance with respect to the spatial sector (although the Lorentz invariance has been verified experimentally at sufficiently large scales, it is possible to have a Lorentz invariance violation at high energies (Please see [2] for details). This possibility also has been partially confirmed in some recent experiments, see [3,4] for examples.). By adding higher order spatial derivative terms into the Lagrangian, it can reconcile the UV divergence and make the theory renormalizable by power-counting [5].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…The Lorentz invariance is violated as z > 1 but it assumes that there is a foliated diffeomorphism invariance with respect to the spatial sector (although the Lorentz invariance has been verified experimentally at sufficiently large scales, it is possible to have a Lorentz invariance violation at high energies (Please see [2] for details). This possibility also has been partially confirmed in some recent experiments, see [3,4] for examples.). By adding higher order spatial derivative terms into the Lagrangian, it can reconcile the UV divergence and make the theory renormalizable by power-counting [5].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…where Λ eff is the effective deformation scale for pair-production, defined as a function of the high-energy scale Λ and the parameters β 1 , β 2 , γ 1 , and γ 2 . Comparison with Equation (18) shows the difference with the modification of the threshold in the LIV case by the large factor (m 2 e )/ε 2 . The alteration of the kinematics of SR is then substantially different in the LIV and the RDK cases.…”
Section: Threshold Of Pair Productionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Modified dispersion relations in a LIV scenario are constrained by the time of flight of photons coming from gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) [16][17][18], active galactic nuclei [19], or pulsars [20]. In the framework of the standard model extension [21], a linear (proportional to 1/Λ) variation of the speed of light also implies a birefringence effect, that may be tested in optical polarization measurements [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although GRB afterglows have frequently been observed to span the radio to GeV bands, they had eluded detection in TeV gamma rays for a long time, despite numerous searches over many decades. A detection in the TeV band was finally achieved for GRB 190114C with the Major Atmospheric Gamma Imaging Cherenkov (MAGIC) telescopes, starting from ∼60 seconds after the burst in the energy range 0.2-1 TeV and beyond, which provided the first strong evidence for inverse Compton emission from the afterglow (Mirzoyan et al 2019;MAGIC Collaboration et al 2019a,b), as well as new constraints on Lorentz invariance violation (Acciari et al 2020). The detection of gamma rays with energies above 0.1 TeV with the High Energy Stereoscopic System (H.E.S.S.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%