2017
DOI: 10.3150/15-bej741
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bounds for the normal approximation of the maximum likelihood estimator

Abstract: While the asymptotic normality of the maximum likelihood estimator under regularity conditions is long established, this paper derives explicit bounds for the bounded Wasserstein distance between the distribution of the maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) and the normal distribution. For this task, we employ Stein's method. We focus on independent and identically distributed random variables, covering both discrete and continuous distributions as well as exponential and non-exponential families. In particular, … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
62
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These regularity conditions in the multi-parameter case resemble those in [3] where the parameter is scalar. The following theorem gives the qualitative result for the asymptotic normality of a vector MLE (see [6] for a proof).…”
Section: ) the Expected Fisher Information Matrix For One Random Vecmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…These regularity conditions in the multi-parameter case resemble those in [3] where the parameter is scalar. The following theorem gives the qualitative result for the asymptotic normality of a vector MLE (see [6] for a proof).…”
Section: ) the Expected Fisher Information Matrix For One Random Vecmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…The bound in (21) is not as simple and sharp as the bound given in Theorem 2.1 of Anastasiou and Reinert (2014). This is expected since Corollary 2.1 is a special application of a result which was originally obtained to satisfy the assumption of local dependence for our random variables, while Anastasiou and Reinert (2014) used directly results of Stein's method for independent random variables. In addition, the assumption (A.D.1) used for the result of Corollary 2.1 is stronger than the condition (R3) of Anastasiou and Reinert (2014).…”
Section: The General Boundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…i ∨ y (2) i ], with the edges parallel to the coordinate axes in R n , and y (1) and y (2) are two opposite vertices of the box. Now we can state the mentioned lemma:…”
Section: Appendix A: On Condition (11)mentioning
confidence: 99%