2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2014.01.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bounding quantile demand functions using revealed preference inequalities

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
65
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We show that Slutsky constrained nonparametric estimates reveal features of the demand function that are not present in simple parametric models. Where prices take only a few discrete values, a related approach is to impose the Afriat revealed preference inequalities (see Blundell, Kristensen, & Matzkin, 2014). Our method is quite different, directly using the Slutsky condition rather than the sequence of revealed preference inequalities that obtain in the discrete price case.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We show that Slutsky constrained nonparametric estimates reveal features of the demand function that are not present in simple parametric models. Where prices take only a few discrete values, a related approach is to impose the Afriat revealed preference inequalities (see Blundell, Kristensen, & Matzkin, 2014). Our method is quite different, directly using the Slutsky condition rather than the sequence of revealed preference inequalities that obtain in the discrete price case.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A related literature on stochastic discrete choice demand beginning with Block and Marschak (1960), Brown andWalker (1989), andMcFadden andRichter (1991) has spawned a large body of applied work in both empirical consumer demand and industrial organization (e.g., Berry, Levinsohn, and Pakes (1995)). More recently, several papers have attempted to marry the demand and revealed preference approaches, e.g., Blundell, Browning, and Crawford (2003, 2007, 2008, Hoderlein (2011), Kitamura and Stoye (2013), Blundell, Kristensen, and Matzkin (2014), and Hoderlein andStoye (2014, 2015).…”
Section: Data Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Convexity of the support set is an important property both for describing bounds on demand responses and also making welfare comparisons (see, e.g., Blundell, Browning, and Crawford (2008) and Blundell et al (2014)). It is therefore useful that this property is preserved even under partially observed prices.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our method can be thought of as a nonparametric analogue to this approach, where admissible candidate estimates are restricted to those satisfying these restrictions of consumer theory. Where prices take only a few discrete values an equivalent approach is to impose the Afriat revealed preference inequalities, see Blundell, Kristensen, and Matzkin (2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%