2009 IEEE 12th International Conference on Computer Vision 2009
DOI: 10.1109/iccv.2009.5459208
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Boundary ownership by lifting to 2.1D

Abstract: This paper addresses the "boundary ownership" problem, also known as the figure/ground

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
35
0
6

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
35
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…We simply attempt to replicate human behavior by training on human-annotated data. As previously pointed out [20,16], this means that figure/ground ordering does not necessarily correspond to depth or occlusion ordering. For example, humans may indicate strong figure/ground percepts due to markings on flat surfaces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We simply attempt to replicate human behavior by training on human-annotated data. As previously pointed out [20,16], this means that figure/ground ordering does not necessarily correspond to depth or occlusion ordering. For example, humans may indicate strong figure/ground percepts due to markings on flat surfaces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…The most closely related work to ours is that of Ren et al [24] and Leichter and Lindenbaum [16], both of which focus on solving an easier problem than the one suggested here. Leichter and Lindenbaum take the human-drawn ground-truth segmentations [19] and human figure/ground annotations [10] of the BSDS images and learn a conditional random field (CRF) for assigning boundary ownership.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The problem to detect on occlusion boundaries which side is figure and which side is ground has been addressed by works in [14]- [16]. Similar to depth estimation systems, some of these approaches rely also on low level cues such as shapemes [14], convexity or parallelism [15]. The main drawback of these systems is that they do not provide closed partitions and only single contours are labeled.…”
Section: B Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%