2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00403-020-02132-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Botulinum toxin type A versus 5-Fluorouracil in treatment of keloid

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of BTX-A in treatment of keloids has been an issue of dispute. The results of the current study come in agreement with several previous reports 8, [16][17][18][19][20][21] that documented the efficacy of BTX-A in the management of keloids.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The use of BTX-A in treatment of keloids has been an issue of dispute. The results of the current study come in agreement with several previous reports 8, [16][17][18][19][20][21] that documented the efficacy of BTX-A in the management of keloids.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In addition, Sabry et al, 18 observed that intralesional injection of BTX‐A of keloids was more therapeutically effective than fractional CO 2 laser followed by topical application of BTX‐A. Furthermore, Ismail et al, 19 reported that intralesional injection of BTX‐A was found to be more effective than 5‐fluorouracil in the treatment of keloids even in big sized lesions with fewer adverse effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the degree of changes in serum MDA and SOD levels will decrease more significantly after IAH is relieved [ 12 ].…”
Section: Bont-a Injection Improves Iah In Rats Undergoing Abdominal A...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After removing duplicates, 951 studies remained, of which 915 were subsequently excluded by screening the titles and abstracts. Thirty-six studies went through a full-text check, and 21 failed to pass the inspection for the following reasons: treating instead of preventing pathological scars, [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] lack of raw data, 22,23 other article types, 6,15,24 original RCT information for included articles, [25][26][27] and unfinished RCTs. 28,29 Finally, 16 RCTs with 671 cases (510 patients) met the eligibility criteria for meta-analysis (Figure 1).…”
Section: Search Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%