2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-5890.2009.00091.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Borrowing to Finance Public Investment? The ‘Golden Rule of Public Finance’ Reconsidered in an Endogenous Growth Setting*

Abstract: In this paper, we look for long‐run and short‐run effects of fiscal deficits on economic growth and welfare in a standard endogenous growth model. We show that, under very general hypotheses, the ‘golden rule of public finance’, which allows a government to run public‐investment‐oriented fiscal deficits, leads to a lower balanced‐growth path in the long run, and eventually in the short run, compared with balanced‐budget rules. Welfare effects are more difficult to assess, and depend on the form of the utility … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(38 reference statements)
1
27
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In Gemmell and Kneller (2002) only conditional βconvergence is obtained for this variable over the period 1970-1995. confirming the overall result of the panel analysis. Given that in the early 1990s public investment over GDP was close to 3%, the increased heterogeneity combined with a decreasing share seems at odds with the debate on the revision of the Stability and Growth Pact, aimed at reconsidering the 3% deficit/GDP threshold in the light of a "golden rule" of public finance (Minea and Billeu 2009) and may prove harmful in a longer term perspective (Easterly, Irwin, and Serven 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Gemmell and Kneller (2002) only conditional βconvergence is obtained for this variable over the period 1970-1995. confirming the overall result of the panel analysis. Given that in the early 1990s public investment over GDP was close to 3%, the increased heterogeneity combined with a decreasing share seems at odds with the debate on the revision of the Stability and Growth Pact, aimed at reconsidering the 3% deficit/GDP threshold in the light of a "golden rule" of public finance (Minea and Billeu 2009) and may prove harmful in a longer term perspective (Easterly, Irwin, and Serven 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is, however, little consensus about the validity of the GRPF. Balassone and Franco [54], Buiter [55], Buti et al [56], and Minea and Villieu [57] question the positive effect of GRPF. Balassone and Franco [54] emphasize that the GRPF will result in a bias towards over-accumulation of physical assets at the expense of health and education expenditures.…”
Section: Public Debt and Economic Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An asymptotically zero debt to GDP ratio can be obtained either through a balanced government budget or through public deficits that imply a positive growth rate of public debt that, however, is smaller than the growth rate of GDP. Minea and Villieu (2009) also present an endogenous growth model with public capital and public debt and posit that the government is allowed to run deficits only in order to finance public investment, that is the government obeys the 'golden rule of public finance'. They find that a balanced budget rule yields a higher growth rate than an economy where the government runs permanent deficits and, erroneously, conclude that the 'golden rule of public finance' implies a smaller long-run growth rate than the balanced budget rule.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%