2015
DOI: 10.2110/palo.2014.099
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Boreal Early Turonian Calcareous Nannofossils From Nearshore Settings—implications for Paleoecology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Difficulties with the interpretation of supposed eutrophic taxa (e.g., B. constans, small Zeugrhabdotus spp.) were previously discussed by Lees et al [2005], Mutterlose et al [2005], and Linnert and Mutterlose [2015]. These authors suggest that ecological factors such as competition with other organisms, light, salinity, and temperature may have been underestimated in past interpretations.…”
Section: Paleofertility Index Taxamentioning
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Difficulties with the interpretation of supposed eutrophic taxa (e.g., B. constans, small Zeugrhabdotus spp.) were previously discussed by Lees et al [2005], Mutterlose et al [2005], and Linnert and Mutterlose [2015]. These authors suggest that ecological factors such as competition with other organisms, light, salinity, and temperature may have been underestimated in past interpretations.…”
Section: Paleofertility Index Taxamentioning
confidence: 86%
“…[], Mutterlose et al . [], and Linnert and Mutterlose []. These authors suggest that ecological factors such as competition with other organisms, light, salinity, and temperature may have been underestimated in past interpretations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Significant differences in the relative timing of Turonian planktonic foraminiferal and calcareous nannofossil bioevents and their inter-correlation have led to uncertainties in the chronostratigraphic framework applied in various studies. For example, the first appearance datum (FAD) of the calcareous nannofossil Quadrum gartneri Prins and Perch-Nielsen (in Manivit et al 1977), is within or just above the uppermost portion of the positive δ 13 C excursion that defines OAE2 (Tsikos et al 2004, Linnert andMutterlose 2015) and below the FAD of the planktonic fora minifer Helvetoglobotruncana helvetica (Bolli 1945), whereas GTS 2012 onsiders these FADs to be synchronous. Similarly, the relative order of the FAD of Eiffellithus eximius (Stover 1966) and the last appearance datum (LAD) of H. helvetica and the assigned ages also differ considerably among various studies and geological time scale schemes (see discussion in Huber and Petrizzo 2014, p. 46).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instable conditions with well-mixed surface waters and an increased influx of nutrient-enriched deep-waters. Climatic phases afterBodin et al (2015); oceanography modified afterGale et al (2000) andLinnert & Mutterlose (2015); absolute ages afterGradstein (2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%