2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2020.01.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bootstrap based probability forecasting in multiplicative error models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where M n is a random variable that converges to zero with probability one. Here we have used some arguments from the proof of Lemma 6 in Perera and Silvapulle (2021). Furthermore, for some K < ∞, we have that…”
Section: A2 Some Preliminary Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where M n is a random variable that converges to zero with probability one. Here we have used some arguments from the proof of Lemma 6 in Perera and Silvapulle (2021). Furthermore, for some K < ∞, we have that…”
Section: A2 Some Preliminary Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, is assumed to be fixed for the statistical analysis. The asymptotic results do not change if ς 0 is replaced by an arbitrarily chosen vector (e.g., by setting Y t = 0 and h t = 0, all t ≤ 0); see, for example, the discussions in Straumann and Mikosch (2006), Perera and Silvapulle (2021) and Jensen and Rahbek (2004).…”
Section: Formulation Of the Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, we show that our recursive bootstrap corresponds to a residual-based bootstrap in the ACD world (as discussed e.g. in Perera and Silvapulle, 2021), with the crucial difference that the number of events generated through our scheme is random, rather than being fixed. This is a key improvement, as our bootstrap ensures that the sum of the bootstrap waiting times always cover the original time interval.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Some of the key features of QML and GMM estimators have been discussed in Pacurar (2008), Hautsch (2012), Brownlees et al (2012), Cipollini et al (2013), and Perera et al (2016), among others. Although these estimators have desirable asymptotic properties, their finite sample performance can at times be sensitive to the (unknown) conditional distribution of the observable process, and hence, in practice, when available, fully efficient maximum likelihood (ML) estimates are often preferred (see Grammig and Maurer, 2000;Perera and Silvapulle, 2021). For example, even though the asymptotic distribution of the QMLE is independent of the innovation distribution, when the data generating process is based on an innovation distribution that induces a non-monotonic hazard rate function (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%