2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10489-018-1383-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Book search using social information, user profiles and query expansion with Pseudo Relevance Feedback

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In line with previous studies (Deveaud et al ., 2012; Kim et al ., 2012; Wu et al ., 2016; Hamad and Al-Shboul, 2017; Kumar et al ., 2019), the results confirmed the informativeness and hence effectiveness of users' comments in improving the performance of an information system. The results of this study are also aligned with the previous research findings on books, in that they showed that user reviews provide a better signal for topical relevance and effectively improve the search results, compared to professional metadata (Koolen, 2014; Koolen et al ., 2012; Zhang et al ., 2016; Kumar et al ., 2019). Social information effectively improve the retrieval of relevant books (Kumar and Pamula, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In line with previous studies (Deveaud et al ., 2012; Kim et al ., 2012; Wu et al ., 2016; Hamad and Al-Shboul, 2017; Kumar et al ., 2019), the results confirmed the informativeness and hence effectiveness of users' comments in improving the performance of an information system. The results of this study are also aligned with the previous research findings on books, in that they showed that user reviews provide a better signal for topical relevance and effectively improve the search results, compared to professional metadata (Koolen, 2014; Koolen et al ., 2012; Zhang et al ., 2016; Kumar et al ., 2019). Social information effectively improve the retrieval of relevant books (Kumar and Pamula, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…car and driver). Here, expansion terms are usually identified from i) user feedback: extracting frequent terms occurring in previous results deemed relevant by the user [41,66], and/or ii) query logs: identifying frequent terms in the document collection based on the associations between past queries and the documents downloaded by the user [30,74]. Yet, the extensive training and huge corpora requirements of corpusbased methods makes them less practical in the context of Web search applications, which has led to a growing interest in knowledge-based solutions [35,61].…”
Section: Query Semantic Analysis and Disambiguationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pseudo-relevance feedback (PRF) is a refinement of relevance feedback which adds an automated step to avoid the user contribution in the process of query expansion [10]. The data flow from the user query to the retrieved documents includes the variation of the weights of query terms assuming that the top retrieved documents are relevant and using the position of the documents as a feedback for relevance (this makes automatic the step c. in Fig.…”
Section: Query Expansion Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%