Bone Quality in Patients Receiving Endosseous Dental Implants

Orenstein, Ira H.; Synan, William; Truhlar, Richard S.; Morris, Harold F.; Ochi, Shigeru

doi:10.1097/00008505-199405000-00004

Cited by 21 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Immediate implantation has little influence when bone shape and quality are not compromised (maxillary premolar region and anterior mandible), but it becomes a major contributing factor when bone shape and quality are compromised (anterior maxilla and posterior regions of both jaws). The preservation of alveolar ridge dimensions immediately after tooth extraction has been documented 23,24 …”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Inter‐Implant Bone Height Changes in Anterior Maxillary Immediate and Non‐Immediate Adjacent Dental Implants

Kupershmidt

Levin

Schwartz‐Arad

2007

Journal of Periodontology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Inter‐Implant Bone Height Changes in Anterior Maxillary Immediate and Non‐Immediate Adjacent Dental Implants

Kupershmidt

Levin

Schwartz‐Arad

2007

Journal of Periodontology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…56 The differing distributions of bone quality by arch and anterior/posterior location for the DICRG study have been reported previously. 57 Vertical bone loss by bone quality scores is shown in Figure 8. There was a slight trend for more bone loss around implants placed in less dense bone, particularly in the early study intervals.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Factors Associated With Radiographic Vertical Bone Loss Around Implants Placed in a Clinical Study

Manz

2000

Ann Periodontol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The loss of vertical bone height over time has been assessed radiographically as part of the Dental Implant Clinical Research Group studies. Radiographs were assessed from implant placement, uncovering surgeries, and recall appointments. Overall, the study implants experienced most peri-implant vertical bone loss in the first year after placement, followed by a dramatic decrease in bone loss rate through the subsequent study intervals. Stratified analysis of data up to 72 months after implant uncovering indicates different bone loss patterns by: 1) arch; 2) jaw region; 3) case type; 4) bone quality; 5) surface type; 6) implant design; 7) smoking status; and 8) postoperative antibiotic treatment. These results will be used to build statistical mixed models to indicate which clinical factors are most predictive of peri-implant vertical bone loss, controlling for confounding and accounting for correlation of data over time and within study patients.

show abstract

“…Whether this variation is related to the small number of HA-coated implants evaluated or changes in the bone-implant complex is not clear at this time. 47…”

Section: Bone Quality and Ptvs Of Ha-coated And Non-ha-coated Implantmentioning

confidence: 99%

Stability of the Bone‐Implant Complex. Results of Longitudinal Testing to 60 Months With the Periotest Device on Endosseous Dental Implants

2000

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Conclusions of the study are as follows: 1) PTVs are influenced by bone quality and surface coating of the implant; 2) the PTVs at the time of uncovering provide the best estimate of a clinically acceptable PTV for that bone-implant complex; 3) while the PTVs for any bone-implant complex may fluctuate +/- 1.0 around the uncovering PTV during routine healing and loading of the implant, a consistent shift toward a positive PTV that approaches "0" should be cause for concern that the bone-implant complex may be at risk of failure; 4) HA-coated implants became slightly less stable (more positive PTVs) over time, while the non-coated implants became more stable (more negative PTVs); and 5) until a "critical PTV" can be accurately identified, it is suggested that a consistent shift in recorded PTVs that exceeds the +3.0 value on the PTV scale should be viewed with concern for possible deterioration at the bone-implant complex.

show abstract

Bone Quality in Patients Receiving Endosseous Dental Implants

Cited by 21 publications

References 0 publications

Inter‐Implant Bone Height Changes in Anterior Maxillary Immediate and Non‐Immediate Adjacent Dental Implants

Inter‐Implant Bone Height Changes in Anterior Maxillary Immediate and Non‐Immediate Adjacent Dental Implants

Factors Associated With Radiographic Vertical Bone Loss Around Implants Placed in a Clinical Study

Stability of the Bone‐Implant Complex. Results of Longitudinal Testing to 60 Months With the Periotest Device on Endosseous Dental Implants

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About