Bone defect animal models for testing efficacy of bone substitute biomaterials

Abstract

SummaryLarge bone defects are serious complications that are most commonly caused by extensive trauma, tumour, infection, or congenital musculoskeletal disorders. If nonunion occurs, implantation for repairing bone defects with biomaterials developed as a defect filler, which can promote bone regeneration, is essential. In order to evaluate biomaterials to be developed as bone substitutes for bone defect repair, it is essential to establish clinically relevant in vitro and in vivo testing models for investigating their biocompatibility, mechanical properties, degradation, and interactional with culture medium or host tissues. The results of the in vitro experiment contribute significantly to the evaluation of direct cell response to the substitute biomaterial, and the in vivo tests constitute a step midway between in vitro tests and human clinical trials. Therefore, it is essential to develop or adopt a suitable in vivo bone defect animal model for testing bone substitutes for defect repair. This review aimed at introducing and discussing the most available and commonly used bone defect animal models for testing specific substitute biomaterials. Additionally, we reviewed surgical protocols for establishing relevant preclinical bone defect models with various animal species and the evaluation methodologies of the bone regeneration process after the implantation of bone substitute biomaterials. This review provides an important reference for preclinical studies in translational orthopaedics.

Surface modification of vascular endothelial growth factor-loaded silk fibroin to improve biological performance of ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene via promoting angiogenesis

“…Thereupon, the size of the bone tunnel needed drilling during ACL reconstruction operation could be smaller, which is a favorable factor for bone regeneration. 60 This could be another advantage for UHMWPE application in artificial ligament needed to be investigated further.…”

Bone regeneration with bovine bone impairs orthodontic tooth movement despite proper osseous wound healing in a novel mouse model

“…In a recent review, Li et al. discussed available animal models for alveolar bone regeneration . The authors concluded that most studies fail to discuss the grounds for choosing a specific animal model and the clinical indications that the model simulates.…”

“…The available in vivo ABR models are mostly large animal ones, such as the calvaria models in rabbits and rats, and alveolar bone models in rats, rabbits, pigs, and dogs . These models provide valuable information regarding the strength and limitations of ABR materials and modalities.…”

Clinical Application of Macroporous Ceramic to Promote Bone Healing in Veterinary Clinical Cases

“…For practical purposes, if there is no more than 30% of the mineralization area after 52 weeks, lifelong incomplete bone healing is to be assumed [32]. The incapacity of natural healing when left untreated represents the negative control, so that the osteogenic potential of the material being tested can be considered unequivocal.…”