2015
DOI: 10.1111/1365-2435.12504
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Body reserves influence allocation to immune responses in capital breeding female northern elephant seals

Abstract: Summary Mounting an immune response requires substantial energy. Ecological immunology theory predicts allocation trade‐offs between reproductive effort and immune responses under conditions of energy limitation. Little is known about the impact of capital breeding strategies on energy allocation to immune function in mammals. Northern elephant seals (NES) forage in the marine environment, breed in dense terrestrial colonies and exhibit high rates of energy expenditure for lactation while fasting. Body reser… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
28
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
2
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mounting an immune response is energetically costly (Lochmiller andDeeremberg 2000, Bonneaud et al 2003) and can reduce fat reserves (DiAngelo et al 2009, Peck et al 2016. For example, bacterial infection can lead to inhibition of nutrient storage and hydrolyzation, and release of adipose tissue triglycerides (Khovidhunkit et al 2004), which in turn can make organisms more vulnerable to environmental stressors such as pesticides (Janssens and Stoks 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mounting an immune response is energetically costly (Lochmiller andDeeremberg 2000, Bonneaud et al 2003) and can reduce fat reserves (DiAngelo et al 2009, Peck et al 2016. For example, bacterial infection can lead to inhibition of nutrient storage and hydrolyzation, and release of adipose tissue triglycerides (Khovidhunkit et al 2004), which in turn can make organisms more vulnerable to environmental stressors such as pesticides (Janssens and Stoks 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Organisms must allocate limited resources among competing life‐history demands (Stearns, ). In particular, trade‐offs between the reproductive and immune systems are predicted to be quite strong when resources are limited (French, DeNardo, & Moore, ; Stahlschmidt, Rollinson, Acker, & Adamo, ), although the magnitude and direction of the trade‐off can be influenced by many factors (French & Moore, ; Peck, Costa, & Crocker, ; Skibiel, Speakman, & Hood, ). Studies attempting to measure these trade‐offs are often hindered because of the complexity of the physiological systems involved and the difficulty of interpreting measurements that lack a common unit.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research across numerous taxa has connected processes of immune function with nutritional condition, food availability, and physiological stress (Stahlschmidt et al 2015, van Dijk et al 2015, Peck et al 2016. For example, immune function was altered in North American elk and red deer as a function of suppressed nutritional condition in response to high density or manipulation of food availability (Landete-Castillejos et al 2002, Downs et al 2015.…”
Section: Where Do We Go From Here?mentioning
confidence: 99%