2018
DOI: 10.1108/md-11-2017-1111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Board financial expertise and dividend-paying behavior of firms

Abstract: Purpose Numerous researchers have developed theories and studies to uncover the issues pertinent to dividend policy dynamics, but it is still one of the unresolved problems of finance. The purpose of this paper is to focus on a new dimension, i.e., financial expertise on the corporate board for explaining the dividend policy dynamics in the emerging equity markets of China and Pakistan. Design/methodology/approach The study employs static (fixed effect (FE) and random effect (RE)) and dynamic models – two-st… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
(63 reference statements)
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the opposite, Setiawan & Phua (2013) evidenced specifically from Indonesia that low GCG in Indonesia is negatively related to dividend policy. It supports the substitute theory and like Sarwar et al (2018) finding regarding Chinese firms. Additionally, shareholder composition is proved to be insignificant.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the opposite, Setiawan & Phua (2013) evidenced specifically from Indonesia that low GCG in Indonesia is negatively related to dividend policy. It supports the substitute theory and like Sarwar et al (2018) finding regarding Chinese firms. Additionally, shareholder composition is proved to be insignificant.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The complementary effect between firm level and country level CG is highlighted. Sarwar et al (2018) found contradictory results. They emphasize that Chinese firms do not use dividends as a control mechanism, while Pakistani firms confirm complement hypothesis between firms and shareholders while highlighting the importance of board composition and financial expertise.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researcher uses the singling theory to examine the response of market for dividend payout, dividend payment changes and their relation with firms' future earnings (Mileti c, 2011). In agency theory context, researchers have studied the determinants of dividend policy at micro and macro level including heterogeneous factors of firms (Mahdzan, Zainudin, & Shahri, 2016), corporate governance characteristics (Sarwar et al, 2018), investor protection (La Porta et al, 2002) and managerial ability (Sarwar et al, 2019). In current decade, the effect of uncertainty on dividend policy has gained wide acceptance of researchers that is followed by two correlated thrusts.…”
Section: Theoretical Background and Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e study investigates the board financial expertise's impact on corporate cash holding, which is motivated by two reasons. First, comprehensive media reports about several firm's cash holding practices like Google, Apple, and Microsoft [12,14], along with renowned corporate scandals like HealthSouth, Enron, WorldCom, and Tyco [38,39], have shifted the attention of regulators and market makers to have financial expertise on board for effective corporate governance mechanisms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…erefore, weakening governance system in family firms in emerging economies like Pakistan requires special attention, which ultimately affects corporate policies, including cash holdings. Second, numerous studies examined the relationship of board financial expertise with specific corporate policies, including earning management [40], dividend policy [38], corruption disclosure [41], firm performance [42], and audit quality [43]. Moreover, financial expertise also improves board efficiency [44] and leads to better corporate governance practices [45].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%