2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2018.03.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Blast Exposure Disrupts the Tonotopic Frequency Map in the Primary Auditory Cortex

Abstract: Blast exposure can cause various auditory disorders including tinnitus, hyperacusis, and other central auditory processing disorders. While this is suggestive of pathologies in the central auditory system, the impact of blast exposure on central auditory processing remains poorly understood. Here we examined the effects of blast shockwaves on acoustic response properties and the tonotopic frequency map in the auditory cortex. We found that multiunits recorded from the auditory cortex exhibited higher acoustic … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In vivo electrophysiological recording and sensory stimuli methods have been described previously 67 . In this study, two anesthetics were used to eliminate potential influence of anesthetics.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In vivo electrophysiological recording and sensory stimuli methods have been described previously 67 . In this study, two anesthetics were used to eliminate potential influence of anesthetics.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After 20 min of baseline recording, M-8324 was infused into lateral ventricle at 0.5 µL/min for 10 min. Data analysis was done off-line with custom MATLAB programs 67 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of particular interest in the paired‐VNS t paradigm is the observation that noise and blast‐induced hearing loss can alter downstream tonotopic properties of auditory cortex, well beyond the so‐called “critical period;” a time frame in early development during which the central nervous system is most malleable to change 5,46‐49 . As a phenomenological aspect of this effect, reactive neuroanatomical and neurophysiological changes to tonotopic areas of auditory cortex can take the form of expansion or contraction of specific anatomical spatial/frequency bandwidth relative to their “normal” unaffected neighboring regions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increasing clinical (Berger et al, 1997;Cohen et al, 2002;Cave et al, 2007;Ritenour et al, 2008;Lew et al, 2009;Gallun et al, 2012a) and laboratory (Patterson and Hamernik, 1997;Ewert et al, 2012;Cho et al, 2013b;Du et al, 2013;Masri et al, 2018) evidence suggest that both peripheral and central auditory system (CAS) are important blast-susceptible structures, where CAS includes the brainstem, midbrain, thalamus, and cortex. Subcortical CAS such as the auditory brainstem may be particularly vulnerable to blast injury, including hemorrhages, intracranial deformation and blood-brain barrier (BBB) permeability, glutamate excitotoxicity, elevated calcium, as well as elevated markers of oxidative stress and neuroinflammation from near short-term (1-7 days) up to 2 weeks (Knudsen and Øen, 2003;Leung et al, 2008;Säljö et al, 2011;Cho et al, 2013a;Song et al, 2015;Walls et al, 2016;Laplaca et al, 1997;Hamann et al, 2008)).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, significant hearing difficulties can occur in the absence of peripheral diagnostic indicators such as eardrum rupture or clinical threshold shifts (hearing loss >25 dB), indicating that were not apparent with simple audiological measures (Gallun et al 2012b;Saunders et al 2015;Bressler et al 2017;Kubli et al 2018). However, blast studies in animals rarely go beyond simple auditory stimuli such as clicks, tones and AM modulation in a quiet background (Ewert et al 2012;Race et al 2017;Masri et al 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%