2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jembe.2012.10.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biotic resistance to the infiltration of natural benthic habitats: Examining the role of predation in the distribution of the invasive ascidian Botrylloides violaceus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the cause for dissimilarity between artificial and natural habitats appears to vary distinctly among broad taxonomic groups. For sessile epifauna, the most frequently cited reason is the high prevalence of invasive species on artificial substrata, which is linked to differences in biotic interactions between natural and artificial habitats (Rodemann & Brandl, ; Rogers et al., ; Ruiz et al., ; Simkanin et al., ). Furthermore, orientation, slope, and material of the artificial structure are also cited as important agents for homogenization of invertebrate assemblages (Glasby & Connell, ), with the availability of microtopographic refuges being particularly important for sessile organisms (Brandl & Bellwood, ; Freestone & Osman, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the cause for dissimilarity between artificial and natural habitats appears to vary distinctly among broad taxonomic groups. For sessile epifauna, the most frequently cited reason is the high prevalence of invasive species on artificial substrata, which is linked to differences in biotic interactions between natural and artificial habitats (Rodemann & Brandl, ; Rogers et al., ; Ruiz et al., ; Simkanin et al., ). Furthermore, orientation, slope, and material of the artificial structure are also cited as important agents for homogenization of invertebrate assemblages (Glasby & Connell, ), with the availability of microtopographic refuges being particularly important for sessile organisms (Brandl & Bellwood, ; Freestone & Osman, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For examples, predation, competition, and facilitation may affect the abundance of invasive species. Predation often decreases colonization (Schoener and Spiller 1995;Dumont et al 2011;Simkanin et al 2013) and increases mortality of introduced species (Reusch 1998). Competition for resources such as space (Stachowicz et al 2002) and food (Petren and Case 1996) can also reduce the chance of colonization by introduced species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the reasons for which invasive species are not as dominant in natural habitats, compared to artificial ones, is the high level of competition with local species (Simkanin et al, 2013). In the current study, the ratio between invasive and local species was significantly lower in the EA compared to SA both in fish and invertebrates (Tables 6 and 7).…”
Section: Invasive Speciesmentioning
confidence: 42%