2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.117755
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomimetic design of ultrathin edge-riched FeOOH@Carbon nanotubes as high-efficiency electrocatalysts for water splitting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
32
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
2
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be seen that NiFeCo‐LDH/CF exhibits the lowest overpotential (249 mV at j = 10 mA cm −2 ) and the same trend of Tafel slopes for the series catalysts, which can be attributed to the optimized electronic structure permitting fast charge transfer and benefiting adsorption/desorption for oxygenated species. [ 17b,30 ] Furthermore, partial electronic redistribution among Ni, Fe, and Co by the bridging O 2− at the interface of the catalysts can further improve the adsorption/desorption character of oxygenated species, thus enhancing the electrocatalytic kinetics for OER. More comparison for OER activities with other nickel, iron, and/or cobalt‐based catalysts in recently reported literatures was also summarized in Table S2 of the Supporting Information.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It can be seen that NiFeCo‐LDH/CF exhibits the lowest overpotential (249 mV at j = 10 mA cm −2 ) and the same trend of Tafel slopes for the series catalysts, which can be attributed to the optimized electronic structure permitting fast charge transfer and benefiting adsorption/desorption for oxygenated species. [ 17b,30 ] Furthermore, partial electronic redistribution among Ni, Fe, and Co by the bridging O 2− at the interface of the catalysts can further improve the adsorption/desorption character of oxygenated species, thus enhancing the electrocatalytic kinetics for OER. More comparison for OER activities with other nickel, iron, and/or cobalt‐based catalysts in recently reported literatures was also summarized in Table S2 of the Supporting Information.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results indicate that the introduction of CF and Co in NiFeCo‐LDH/CF increases the electronic conductivity and accelerates the charge transfer rate during the OER process. [ 30,31 ] Furthermore, as shown in Figure 6f, the evaluation of NiFeCo‐LDH/CF stability was carried out by chronoamperometry measurement. Compared with NiFe‐LDH and NiFeCo‐LDH (Figure S14, Supporting Information), the NiFeCo‐LDH/CF catalyst exhibits outstanding stability at an overpotential of 249 mV, which displays only a negligible degradation in current density after the long electrolysis of 20 h. Meanwhile, the long cycle LSV curves were presented in the inset in Figure 6f as well.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the noble‐metal‐based materials, such as IrO 2 and RuO 2 , are state‐of‐the‐art catalysts for OER, they are limited by scarcity and unaffordable cost . Therefore, developing low‐cost, stable and earth‐abundant metal electrocatalysts for OER is crucial …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Constructing hierarchical structure by hybridizing FeOOH with conductive substrate is an effective strategy to fully expose the active sites and facilitate fast charge transfer during electrochemical reactions. Traditional conductive substrates such graphene and carbon nanotube inevitably compromise between conductivity and surface functional groups, thus limiting their application in electric catalysis …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The iron oxide family (Fe 2 O 3 , Fe 3 O 4 ) is considered a candidate material for the next generation of lithium-ion anode materials (Chen et al, 2019a,b;Li et al, 2019). Iron oxide has the following advantages: easy availability, natural nontoxicity, low cost and very high theoretical capacity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%