2017
DOI: 10.1123/jsr.2015-0071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract: CKCUES test kinematic and kinetic measures were not different among 3 conditions based on distance between hands. However, the test might not be suitable for initial or mild-level rehabilitation due to its challenging requirements.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
1
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
37
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For the CKCUEST, subjects had to adopt a push-up position with the hands 91.4 cm apart (marked with two stripes of tape on the floor) and with both shoulders perpendicular to the hands [12,14,27,30,34,35] (▶ Fig. 3).…”
Section: Ckcuestmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the CKCUEST, subjects had to adopt a push-up position with the hands 91.4 cm apart (marked with two stripes of tape on the floor) and with both shoulders perpendicular to the hands [12,14,27,30,34,35] (▶ Fig. 3).…”
Section: Ckcuestmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 In contrast to the variety of FPTs available for the lower extremity, such as the single-legged-hop test variations, few FPTs are available for upper extremity testing. Various closed kinetic chain tests, including push-up variations, 2 the 1-arm hop for distance, 3 and the closed kinetic chain upper extremity stability test, [4][5][6] have been described. Although these reflect important aspects of upper extremity function, many functional tasks, such as throwing and reaching, involve the upper extremity functioning in an open kinetic chain manner.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using this model, estimates of shoulder angle for different start conditions were plotted against the percentile of the population (Figure 2). Different start positions were modelled and plotted; 36" in line with the original test description, 50% height demonstrates the effect of normalisation to the individuals' anthropometrics and 150% bi-acromial distance as this was trialled by Tucci et al (2017), and hands below the shoulders producing 90°.…”
Section: Figure 1 Representation Of a Participant In The Start Position For Ckcuestmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, one aspect which has been somewhat overlooked is the modification of the test for the individual anthropometrics. A potential issue that is shared by Tucci et al (2014) and Tucci et al (2017). Within the initial conception of the CKCUEST (Goldbeck and Davies, 2000), the hand placement 36" (91.44cm) apart as standard is not justified.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%