Biological Anthropology of the Human Skeleton 2018
DOI: 10.1002/9781119151647.ch6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biomechanical Analyses of Archaeological Human Skeletons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
260
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(290 citation statements)
references
References 198 publications
4
260
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We obtained cross-sections at 50% of bone length for the femur and at 40% of bone length measured from the distal end for the humerus (to avoid the deltoid tuberosity). Similar cross-sectional locations have been used in previous studies assessing long bone diaphyseal mechanical performance (Ruff, 2008).…”
Section: Cross-sectional Geometric Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We obtained cross-sections at 50% of bone length for the femur and at 40% of bone length measured from the distal end for the humerus (to avoid the deltoid tuberosity). Similar cross-sectional locations have been used in previous studies assessing long bone diaphyseal mechanical performance (Ruff, 2008).…”
Section: Cross-sectional Geometric Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CSG properties are routinely used to quantify the biomechanical performance of bone following the principles of "bone function adaptation" (Pearson & Lieberman, 2004;Ruff, 2008), and to infer activityrelated mechanical loading patterns in long bones (e.g., Ruff, 2008).…”
Section: Csg Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most simply, in healthy individuals bone is laid down where it is needed and resorbed where not needed, and its amount and distribution can be measured using cross-sectional properties (Lieberman, Polk, & Demes, 2004;Ruff, 2008;Stock & Pfeiffer, 2001). Changes in cross-sectional geometry (CSG) reflect the combined effects of bone remodeling on the endosteal surface and apposition on the periosteal surface, which alter the amount and distribution of skeletal tissue across the lifespan (Figure 1).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept that bone is adapted to its mechanical environment during life has been widely applied in anthropological studies to understand the variations of past and present populations regarding subsistence strategy and mobility (Ruff & Hayes, 1983a;Ruff & Larsen, 1990;Ruff, Larsen, & Hayes, 1984;Sládek, Berner, & Sailer, 2006;Trinkaus & Ruff, 1999), sexual dimorphism (Berner, Sládek, Holt, Niskanen, & Ruff, 2017) and adaptation to the environment (Ruff, 2007;Stock & Pfeiffer, 2001). Bone adapts to mechanical loads by subtly modifying its mass and architecture to match the strains incurred by the skeleton (Frost, 1990b;Sommerfeldt & Rubin, 2001;Turner, 1998).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been shown that long bones, particularly at midshaft, are loaded predominantly in bending (Rubin et al, 1990) and, as a consequence, measures of bending rigidity provide a means to infer the history of mechanical loading (Robling & Stout, 2003). (Ruff, 2007). Second moment of areas (I) measure the quantity and distribution to quantify bending rigidity or, in other words, the capacity of the bone to resist bending in a given axis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%