2019
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract: Biomaterials have long been used to repair defects in the clinical setting, which has led to the development of a wide variety of new materials tailored to specific therapeutic purposes. The efficiency in the repair of the defect and the safety of the different materials employed are determined not only by the nature and structure of their components, but also by the anatomical site where they will be located. Biomaterial implantation into the abdominal cavity in the form of a surgical mesh, such as in the cas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 115 publications
(155 reference statements)
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Experimental animal models have become vital in the evaluation of abdominal meshes for hernia repair since they allow comparison between different implants placed with same surgical technique. This fact provides information about abdominal mesh performance parameters as integration into the recipient tissue, encapsulation, infection susceptibility, remesothelialization capacity and adhesiogenic potential [51].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimental animal models have become vital in the evaluation of abdominal meshes for hernia repair since they allow comparison between different implants placed with same surgical technique. This fact provides information about abdominal mesh performance parameters as integration into the recipient tissue, encapsulation, infection susceptibility, remesothelialization capacity and adhesiogenic potential [51].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study underlines how the behavior of a biomaterial can be dramatically modeled by the processing with a polymeric coating. Recent reviews [46][47][48] , claim that an ideal material for abdominal wall reinforcement should be able to be integrated and slowly degraded while providing a matrix to native tissue growth. The ideal mesh should also show low encapsulation phenomena, low adhesiogenic potential, resistance to infections and capacity of remesothelialization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Type of material Chemical name of material Ref. 1 A: Non-absorbable synthetic materials Polypropylene (PP) [ 22 ] 2 Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) [ 23 ] 3 Expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) [ 24 ] 4 Polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) [ 24 ] 5 Polyethylene terephthalate (PET) [ 23 ] 6 nylon 6 [ 25 ] 7 Polycarbonate polyurethane urea [ 26 ] 8 Cross-linked acrylic polymer [ 27 ] 9 Polycaprolactone (PCL) based poly (urethane urea) (PUU) [ 28 ] 10 expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) reinforced with fluorinated ethylene propylene (FEP) [ 29 ] 11 Co-knitted using PP and PVDF [ 30 ] 12 Co-knitted using PP and Polyurethane (PU) [ 31 ] 13 Co-knitted using PP and Polycarbonate polyurethane urea [ 32 ] 14 PP with titanium coa...…”
Section: Hernia Meshmentioning
confidence: 99%